Researchers’ Attitudes and Practices towards Open Access Journals: A Literature Review of the Empirical Studies

In this study, fifty-six empirical studies (fifty-one articles and five reports) published between 2017 and 2024 were reviewed to examine researchers’ attitudes and practices towards open access journals (OAJs). The analysis focused on three main topics: researchers’ perceptions of OAJs, researchers’ OAJ publishing behaviours, and factors that influence their decisions to publish or not publish in OAJs. The results suggest that although the majority of researchers acknowledge the benefits of OAJs in terms of accessibility and dissemination, there are ongoing worries about their quality. OAJ publishing behaviours vary significantly by discipline and region, reflecting a complex decision-making process influenced by various factors. Journal quality remains a top priority for researchers when deciding to publish in OAJs, while article processing charge (APC) represents a significant obstacle. However, the opportunity for OAJs to boost the visibility of research outputs presents an incentive that could encourage researchers to publish in such journals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2023-0054
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Researchers’ Attitudes and Practices towards Open Access Journals: A Literature Review of the Empirical Studies

Na Zhang, Jie Xu
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Researchers’ Attitudes and Practices towards Open Access Journals: A Literature Review of the Empirical Studies

Na Zhang, Jie Xu
article en

Abstract

In this study, fifty-six empirical studies (fifty-one articles and five reports) published between 2017 and 2024 were reviewed to examine researchers’ attitudes and practices towards open access journals (OAJs). The analysis focused on three main topics: researchers’ perceptions of OAJs, researchers’ OAJ publishing behaviours, and factors that influence their decisions to publish or not publish in OAJs. The results suggest that although the majority of researchers acknowledge the benefits of OAJs in terms of accessibility and dissemination, there are ongoing worries about their quality. OAJ publishing behaviours vary significantly by discipline and region, reflecting a complex decision-making process influenced by various factors. Journal quality remains a top priority for researchers when deciding to publish in OAJs, while article processing charge (APC) represents a significant obstacle. However, the opportunity for OAJs to boost the visibility of research outputs presents an incentive that could encourage researchers to publish in such journals.

Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Wuhan University (CN), National Science Library (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.