Canopy Definitions Shape Canopy Space Filling–Productivity Relationships: Evidence From Terrestrial Laser Scanning

Many important processes in forest ecosystems are influenced by the spatial structure of the canopy. The spatial arrangement of trees and their branches within the canopy is crucial for light interception, often resulting in a positive relationship between canopy space filling and stand productivity. To date, there is no universal definition of canopy space. However, different parts of the canopy have distinct characteristics, making it crucial to assess the significance of varying canopy definitions. In this study, we investigated how canopy space filling changes with four different definitions of canopy space by using a canopy space filling index (CSFI) derived from terrestrial laser scanning. Moreover, we assessed the relative importance of these definitions in explaining stand productivity. Using data from a tropical tree diversity experiment, we found that CSFI strongly varied with the specific delineation of the canopy space. Across canopy definitions, stand productivity was significantly and positively affected by CSFI, indicating that this relationship was generally robust to varying definitions of canopy space. However, excluding the uppermost part and including the lowest part of the canopy space resulted in a distinct decline of explained variance in productivity. In addition, CSFI played a more important role in regulating productivity in mixtures compared to monocultures. Our results highlight the importance of different layers of the canopy space and tree species richness for a better understanding and assessment of forest dynamics and ecosystem functions. Further research is needed on the relationship between canopy space filling and stand productivity based on different canopy space definitions for mature forests and from different biomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73610
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canopy Definitions Shape Canopy Space Filling–Productivity Relationships: Evidence From Terrestrial Laser Scanning

Tama Ray, Matthias Kunz, Andreas Fichtner, Goddert von Oheimb et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Canopy Definitions Shape Canopy Space Filling–Productivity Relationships: Evidence From Terrestrial Laser Scanning

Tama Ray, Matthias Kunz, Andreas Fichtner, Goddert von Oheimb, Michaela Hildebrand, Catherine Potvin, Florian Schnabel, Helge Bruelheide
article en

Abstract

Many important processes in forest ecosystems are influenced by the spatial structure of the canopy. The spatial arrangement of trees and their branches within the canopy is crucial for light interception, often resulting in a positive relationship between canopy space filling and stand productivity. To date, there is no universal definition of canopy space. However, different parts of the canopy have distinct characteristics, making it crucial to assess the significance of varying canopy definitions. In this study, we investigated how canopy space filling changes with four different definitions of canopy space by using a canopy space filling index (CSFI) derived from terrestrial laser scanning. Moreover, we assessed the relative importance of these definitions in explaining stand productivity. Using data from a tropical tree diversity experiment, we found that CSFI strongly varied with the specific delineation of the canopy space. Across canopy definitions, stand productivity was significantly and positively affected by CSFI, indicating that this relationship was generally robust to varying definitions of canopy space. However, excluding the uppermost part and including the lowest part of the canopy space resulted in a distinct decline of explained variance in productivity. In addition, CSFI played a more important role in regulating productivity in mixtures compared to monocultures. Our results highlight the importance of different layers of the canopy space and tree species richness for a better understanding and assessment of forest dynamics and ecosystem functions. Further research is needed on the relationship between canopy space filling and stand productivity based on different canopy space definitions for mature forests and from different biomes.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(5)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Department of Environment and Natural Resources (PH), Forestry Research Centre (IT), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), McGill University (CA), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Smithsonian Institution, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.