Financial innovation in China’s Greater Bay Area: Financial connectivity, institutional bridging and China’s financial statecraft

This article examines the innovative financial connectivity schemes in Hong Kong and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) in southern China to understand China’s regionalized financial statecraft and their implications for the global financial order. While the existing literature tends to depict a coherent “state-capitalist” China exercising offensive financial statecraft to contest the neoliberal global financial order, we highlight the domestic institutional hybridity and spatial dynamics of China’s financial statecraft. Bridging the subnational, national, and global levels of analyses, we argue that these financial connectivity schemes serve as a form of institutional bridging and defensive financial statecraft for China to co-opt and hedge against the US-led global financial order, and to reconfigure its financial sovereignty in cross-border governance. Embedded in China’s domestic institutional hybridity and territorial dynamics, such financial statecraft plays out as a process of cross-border/boundary market-making that aligns Hong Kong closer to China’s national strategies, while maintaining its international role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Competition & Change
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294261448606
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial innovation in China’s Greater Bay Area: Financial connectivity, institutional bridging and China’s financial statecraft

Chen Li, Tim Summers, Chunzi Miao
Competition & Change
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Financial innovation in China’s Greater Bay Area: Financial connectivity, institutional bridging and China’s financial statecraft

Chen Li, Tim Summers, Chunzi Miao
article en

Abstract

This article examines the innovative financial connectivity schemes in Hong Kong and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) in southern China to understand China’s regionalized financial statecraft and their implications for the global financial order. While the existing literature tends to depict a coherent “state-capitalist” China exercising offensive financial statecraft to contest the neoliberal global financial order, we highlight the domestic institutional hybridity and spatial dynamics of China’s financial statecraft. Bridging the subnational, national, and global levels of analyses, we argue that these financial connectivity schemes serve as a form of institutional bridging and defensive financial statecraft for China to co-opt and hedge against the US-led global financial order, and to reconfigure its financial sovereignty in cross-border governance. Embedded in China’s domestic institutional hybridity and territorial dynamics, such financial statecraft plays out as a process of cross-border/boundary market-making that aligns Hong Kong closer to China’s national strategies, while maintaining its international role.

Competition & Change
Nanyang Technological University (SG), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.