Grading in the Digital Age: AI Feedback Versus Professor Feedback

Feedback is a cornerstone of academic development, particularly in marketing education, where skill development often requires iteration and applied practice. While instructors spend considerable time providing effective feedback, artificial intelligence (AI) tools can significantly reduce this burden by generating timely, tailored responses. For example, AI-based chatbots can supplement instruction, providing students with timely feedback and reducing instructors’ workload. This study examines how marketing students perceive feedback quality based on its source, specifically whether it is delivered by an AI system or a human instructor. Through a scenario-based experiment, we investigate student perceptions of feedback quality and effectiveness based on the source (AI vs. Instructor) or valence (positive vs. negative). Our findings provide guidance for professors who want to incorporate AI tools into their teaching practices. Understanding student perceptions of feedback source is crucial for marketing educators who want to leverage AI systems to enhance the educational experience without compromising the human component that students value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marketing Education
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753261440971
Primary Topic
Management and Marketing Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grading in the Digital Age: AI Feedback Versus Professor Feedback

La Toya M. Russell, Ronald Mickler, Andrew Zeiser, Doan Winkel
Journal of Marketing Education
Management and Marketing Education
article

Grading in the Digital Age: AI Feedback Versus Professor Feedback

La Toya M. Russell, Ronald Mickler, Andrew Zeiser, Doan Winkel
article en

Abstract

Feedback is a cornerstone of academic development, particularly in marketing education, where skill development often requires iteration and applied practice. While instructors spend considerable time providing effective feedback, artificial intelligence (AI) tools can significantly reduce this burden by generating timely, tailored responses. For example, AI-based chatbots can supplement instruction, providing students with timely feedback and reducing instructors’ workload. This study examines how marketing students perceive feedback quality based on its source, specifically whether it is delivered by an AI system or a human instructor. Through a scenario-based experiment, we investigate student perceptions of feedback quality and effectiveness based on the source (AI vs. Instructor) or valence (positive vs. negative). Our findings provide guidance for professors who want to incorporate AI tools into their teaching practices. Understanding student perceptions of feedback source is crucial for marketing educators who want to leverage AI systems to enhance the educational experience without compromising the human component that students value.

Journal of Marketing Education
John Carroll University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Management and Marketing Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Grading in the Digital Age: AI Feedback Versus Professor Feedback — La Toya M. Russell, Ronald Mickler, et al. · Journal of Marketing Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS