Association between comorbidities and differences in treatment decisions and outcomes in patients with colon or rectal cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate associations between comorbidities and differences in treatment decisions, outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource utilisation and costs, in patients with colon or rectal cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (Medline) and Embase databases were searched for studies published from January 2000 until January 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included articles that compared the presence and absence of comorbidities, evaluated multiple comorbid conditions or used the Charlson Comorbidity Index, or variations such as the Charlson-Deyo Index. Primary and secondary outcome measures included cancer treatments, outcomes (including complications from treatments, survival and mortality rates), HRQoL, healthcare resource use and costs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists to ensure the quality of data. Findings were summarised narratively. RESULTS: After duplicates were removed, 15 394 hits were screened and 31 studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. Comorbidities were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving treatment and lower survival rates and HRQoL, alongside a higher likelihood of complications following treatment, higher mortality rates and higher healthcare resource use. There were very limited studies that reported on HRQoL and resource use, and none reporting data directly relating to the impact of comorbidities on costs. These results were consistent across North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with colon and rectal cancer, comorbidities are associated with a lower likelihood of receiving treatments and poorer health outcomes. With global populations ageing, there is likely to be an increase in patients with colon and rectal cancer with comorbidities. Therefore, further research is necessary, especially to inform decisions regarding patient management and treatment, and to understand the implications on healthcare resource allocation, costs and HRQoL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096492
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between comorbidities and differences in treatment decisions and outcomes in patients with colon or rectal cancer: a systematic review

Antonieta Medina‐Lara, Stephen Birch, Katharine Wallis, Anne Spencer et al.
BMJ Open
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Association between comorbidities and differences in treatment decisions and outcomes in patients with colon or rectal cancer: a systematic review

Antonieta Medina‐Lara, Stephen Birch, Katharine Wallis, Anne Spencer, Abigail K Lloyd
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate associations between comorbidities and differences in treatment decisions, outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource utilisation and costs, in patients with colon or rectal cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (Medline) and Embase databases were searched for studies published from January 2000 until January 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included articles that compared the presence and absence of comorbidities, evaluated multiple comorbid conditions or used the Charlson Comorbidity Index, or variations such as the Charlson-Deyo Index. Primary and secondary outcome measures included cancer treatments, outcomes (including complications from treatments, survival and mortality rates), HRQoL, healthcare resource use and costs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists to ensure the quality of data. Findings were summarised narratively. RESULTS: After duplicates were removed, 15 394 hits were screened and 31 studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. Comorbidities were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving treatment and lower survival rates and HRQoL, alongside a higher likelihood of complications following treatment, higher mortality rates and higher healthcare resource use. There were very limited studies that reported on HRQoL and resource use, and none reporting data directly relating to the impact of comorbidities on costs. These results were consistent across North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with colon and rectal cancer, comorbidities are associated with a lower likelihood of receiving treatments and poorer health outcomes. With global populations ageing, there is likely to be an increase in patients with colon and rectal cancer with comorbidities. Therefore, further research is necessary, especially to inform decisions regarding patient management and treatment, and to understand the implications on healthcare resource allocation, costs and HRQoL.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(5)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Exeter (GB)
University of Exeter, University of Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.