Canadian Patient Perspectives on Facilitators and Barriers to Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE: To review Canadian patient and caregiver perspectives on the facilitators and barriers to diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in collaboration with a patient partner, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines (PRISMA-ScR). Grey literature and primary studies from Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched from inception to February 2024. Studies of adults with active or healed DFUs and their caregivers were included. Data were independently screened and extracted by two reviewers and key themes were synthesized collaboratively. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies representing 400 patients or caregivers were included, with most individuals living in Ontario (n=15 articles, 68.1%). Five overarching themes capturing facilitators and barriers to DFU care were identified: Prevention, Access to Care, Patient Education, Wound Care, and Patient Impact. Reported barriers included emotional distress, limited mobility, low awareness of self-management strategies, and delayed referrals, while key facilitators involved caregiver and community support as well as education from healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian diabetic foot screening and DFU treatment (preservation) programs should focus on improving access, empowering patients through education, and leveraging community support partners to promote self-management and amputation prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2026.04.009
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canadian Patient Perspectives on Facilitators and Barriers to Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care: A Scoping Review

Tom Weisz, Charles de Mestral, Shireen Fikree, Rudra Pandya et al.
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Canadian Patient Perspectives on Facilitators and Barriers to Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care: A Scoping Review

Tom Weisz, Charles de Mestral, Shireen Fikree, Rudra Pandya, Virginie Blanchette, Alla Iansavitchene
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review Canadian patient and caregiver perspectives on the facilitators and barriers to diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in collaboration with a patient partner, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines (PRISMA-ScR). Grey literature and primary studies from Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched from inception to February 2024. Studies of adults with active or healed DFUs and their caregivers were included. Data were independently screened and extracted by two reviewers and key themes were synthesized collaboratively. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies representing 400 patients or caregivers were included, with most individuals living in Ontario (n=15 articles, 68.1%). Five overarching themes capturing facilitators and barriers to DFU care were identified: Prevention, Access to Care, Patient Education, Wound Care, and Patient Impact. Reported barriers included emotional distress, limited mobility, low awareness of self-management strategies, and delayed referrals, while key facilitators involved caregiver and community support as well as education from healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian diabetic foot screening and DFU treatment (preservation) programs should focus on improving access, empowering patients through education, and leveraging community support partners to promote self-management and amputation prevention.

Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Western University (CA), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of Toronto (CA), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), Diabetes Canada (CA), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.