Passport regulation and the materialization of Japan’s homogeneity myth: Multiple nationalities in Japan, 1985–2025

This article examines how the Japanese government administratively manages dual nationality to maintain the ideological fiction of ethnic homogeneity. While the Japanese passport grants high visa-free access, this privilege is conditional upon adhering to a singular, mono-ethnic definition of nationality. Drawing on a longitudinal qualitative analysis of newsletters (1980–2025) from the Japan Association of Intercultural Families, the study documents structural friction between transnational identities and the state’s registration system. The analysis identifies three mechanisms of administrative exclusion: “orthographic violence” in name standardization, the outsourcing of border control to private gatekeepers creating “identity gaps,” and the use of discretionary power by street-level bureaucrats to coerce disclosure of foreign status. The study concludes that these barriers are design features intended to filter out identity complexity. By prioritizing a family-based model, the state restricts the mobility of global citizens and necessitates a re-evaluation of modern citizenship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205261446463
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Passport regulation and the materialization of Japan’s homogeneity myth: Multiple nationalities in Japan, 1985–2025

Sara Park
Critical Sociology
Japanese History and Culture
article

Passport regulation and the materialization of Japan’s homogeneity myth: Multiple nationalities in Japan, 1985–2025

Sara Park
article en

Abstract

This article examines how the Japanese government administratively manages dual nationality to maintain the ideological fiction of ethnic homogeneity. While the Japanese passport grants high visa-free access, this privilege is conditional upon adhering to a singular, mono-ethnic definition of nationality. Drawing on a longitudinal qualitative analysis of newsletters (1980–2025) from the Japan Association of Intercultural Families, the study documents structural friction between transnational identities and the state’s registration system. The analysis identifies three mechanisms of administrative exclusion: “orthographic violence” in name standardization, the outsourcing of border control to private gatekeepers creating “identity gaps,” and the use of discretionary power by street-level bureaucrats to coerce disclosure of foreign status. The study concludes that these barriers are design features intended to filter out identity complexity. By prioritizing a family-based model, the state restricts the mobility of global citizens and necessitates a re-evaluation of modern citizenship.

Critical Sociology
Kyoto University (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.