Surgical Intervention and Outcome of Patients with Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease

A BSTRACT Background: Pilonidal sinus management remains controversial, with debate over optimal surgical techniques balancing recurrence risk, morbidity, and patient satisfaction. This study compares outcomes of various surgical procedures used for the management of pilonidal sinuses. Materials and Methods: A study entitled, “surgical intervention and outcome of patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal Sinus disease,” was conducted in the department of surgery Skims medical college over a period of 2 years from April 2022 to June 2024. It was a prospective observational study comprising 86 patients. Karydakis flap was done in 29 patients, primary excision with midline closure was done in 14 patients, Limberg flap in 27 patients and Z-plasty in 16 patients. Outcome parameters compared included blood loss, operative time, postoperative complications, pain scores, duration of hospitalization, functional recovery, and long-term outcomes in terms of recurrence, hypertrophic scarring, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among the various surgical, excision with midline closure demonstrated the shortest operative time (48.57 min) and shortest hospitalization (3.57 days) but the highest recurrence (28%), wound complications (35% discharge, 21% dehiscence), and lowest satisfaction (71%). Flap-based techniques exhibited superior long-term outcomes: all exhibited 3% recurrence rate, with Z -plasty excelling in satisfaction (95%), minimal scarring (3%), and low complications (5%–6% infection/dehiscence). Karydakis matched Z -plasty’s satisfaction (95%) but required prolonged recovery (18.86 days to return to normal activity). The Limberg flap incurred the highest morbidity in the form of altered sensation (14%), hypertrophic scarring (14%), and elevated early pain (Day 1: 6.1). Operative blood loss was comparable across the various techniques (21-24 mL), although primary excision showed the least variability (±3.63 standard deviation). Conclusion: While primary excision offers short-term efficiency, its prohibitive recurrence risk and morbidity render it inferior to flap-based techniques. Z -plasty and Karydakis flap optimize the balance of durability, patient satisfaction, and cosmesis, whereas the Limberg flap’s sensory trade-offs limit its utility to complex cases. Surgical strategy should prioritize tension-free, off-midline closures to ensure durable outcomes and patient-centered care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcs.ijcs_53_25
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Intervention and Outcome of Patients with Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Tahir Ahmad Khan, Shams ul Bari, Ajaz Ahmad Malik
Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

Surgical Intervention and Outcome of Patients with Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Tahir Ahmad Khan, Shams ul Bari, Ajaz Ahmad Malik
article en

Abstract

A BSTRACT Background: Pilonidal sinus management remains controversial, with debate over optimal surgical techniques balancing recurrence risk, morbidity, and patient satisfaction. This study compares outcomes of various surgical procedures used for the management of pilonidal sinuses. Materials and Methods: A study entitled, “surgical intervention and outcome of patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal Sinus disease,” was conducted in the department of surgery Skims medical college over a period of 2 years from April 2022 to June 2024. It was a prospective observational study comprising 86 patients. Karydakis flap was done in 29 patients, primary excision with midline closure was done in 14 patients, Limberg flap in 27 patients and Z-plasty in 16 patients. Outcome parameters compared included blood loss, operative time, postoperative complications, pain scores, duration of hospitalization, functional recovery, and long-term outcomes in terms of recurrence, hypertrophic scarring, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among the various surgical, excision with midline closure demonstrated the shortest operative time (48.57 min) and shortest hospitalization (3.57 days) but the highest recurrence (28%), wound complications (35% discharge, 21% dehiscence), and lowest satisfaction (71%). Flap-based techniques exhibited superior long-term outcomes: all exhibited 3% recurrence rate, with Z -plasty excelling in satisfaction (95%), minimal scarring (3%), and low complications (5%–6% infection/dehiscence). Karydakis matched Z -plasty’s satisfaction (95%) but required prolonged recovery (18.86 days to return to normal activity). The Limberg flap incurred the highest morbidity in the form of altered sensation (14%), hypertrophic scarring (14%), and elevated early pain (Day 1: 6.1). Operative blood loss was comparable across the various techniques (21-24 mL), although primary excision showed the least variability (±3.63 standard deviation). Conclusion: While primary excision offers short-term efficiency, its prohibitive recurrence risk and morbidity render it inferior to flap-based techniques. Z -plasty and Karydakis flap optimize the balance of durability, patient satisfaction, and cosmesis, whereas the Limberg flap’s sensory trade-offs limit its utility to complex cases. Surgical strategy should prioritize tension-free, off-midline closures to ensure durable outcomes and patient-centered care.

Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal SurgeryVol. 9(2)
Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.