Soybean response to cover crop and nitrogen fertilizer timing on sandy soil

Abstract The potential for nitrogen (N) fertilization to increase soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield is known to vary with environmental conditions, but the effects of N timing and rate remain unclear in sandy soils. A 2‐year field study was conducted in central Wisconsin to determine the effect of a rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop and N application rate and timing on soybean yield and in‐season dry matter and N accumulation. Treatments included an unfertilized control; a starter application (34 kg‐N ha − 1 ); single applications of 101 kg‐N ha − 1 at 10, 30, 60, or 80 days after emergence (DAE); and split applications totaling 202 or 404 kg‐N ha − 1 applied at 30, 60, and 80 DAE. All fertilizer treatments were nested within a rye cover crop system, planted in the fall and chemically terminated in May prior to soybean planting. Fertilizer effects on yield varied by year. In 2019, the split404 treatment increased yield by 7% relative to the control, while in 2020 no fertilizer treatments significantly affected yield. Both years, starter and 10 DAE treatments increased August N uptake relative to the control but starter led to a slight reduction in N uptake in June in both years. Cover cropping had no effect on soybean yield, dry matter, or N content in 2020, and poor establishment in 2019 prevented meaningful evaluation of effects. Overall, the yield gain observed in 2019 was insufficient to justify the added fertilizer cost, and the effect was not replicated the following year. Therefore, we find no evidence that N fertilization improves yield in irrigated soybean grown on sandy soils in Wisconsin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70396
Primary Topic
Soybean genetics and cultivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soybean response to cover crop and nitrogen fertilizer timing on sandy soil

Shawn P. Conley, Zachary B. Freedman, Grace A. Cagle, Matthew D. Ruark et al.
Agronomy Journal
Soybean genetics and cultivation
article

Soybean response to cover crop and nitrogen fertilizer timing on sandy soil

Shawn P. Conley, Zachary B. Freedman, Grace A. Cagle, Matthew D. Ruark, Alexandra Walters
article en

Abstract

Abstract The potential for nitrogen (N) fertilization to increase soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield is known to vary with environmental conditions, but the effects of N timing and rate remain unclear in sandy soils. A 2‐year field study was conducted in central Wisconsin to determine the effect of a rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop and N application rate and timing on soybean yield and in‐season dry matter and N accumulation. Treatments included an unfertilized control; a starter application (34 kg‐N ha − 1 ); single applications of 101 kg‐N ha − 1 at 10, 30, 60, or 80 days after emergence (DAE); and split applications totaling 202 or 404 kg‐N ha − 1 applied at 30, 60, and 80 DAE. All fertilizer treatments were nested within a rye cover crop system, planted in the fall and chemically terminated in May prior to soybean planting. Fertilizer effects on yield varied by year. In 2019, the split404 treatment increased yield by 7% relative to the control, while in 2020 no fertilizer treatments significantly affected yield. Both years, starter and 10 DAE treatments increased August N uptake relative to the control but starter led to a slight reduction in N uptake in June in both years. Cover cropping had no effect on soybean yield, dry matter, or N content in 2020, and poor establishment in 2019 prevented meaningful evaluation of effects. Overall, the yield gain observed in 2019 was insufficient to justify the added fertilizer cost, and the effect was not replicated the following year. Therefore, we find no evidence that N fertilization improves yield in irrigated soybean grown on sandy soils in Wisconsin.

Agronomy JournalVol. 118(3)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Soybean genetics and cultivation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.