The Sociology of AI as an Emerging Field: Mapping Tensions and Boundaries

ABSTRACT The expanding role of artificial intelligence (AI) in social life compels a foundational reassessment of sociology's concepts, methods, and theoretical commitments. From generative language models to predictive policing, AI systems are no longer mere tools but increasingly agentic, opaque, and normative sociotechnical actors. This article identifies two central tensions that currently define the field: (1) diverse approaches of “sociology on AI” (critical analyses of AI's social impacts) versus “AI for sociology” (instrumental uses of AI in research), and (2) an analytical divide between externalist perspectives focusing on AI's societal consequences and internalist perspectives examining AI's inner workings. Rather than resolving these differences under a single framework, the article argues that recognizing and bridging them can help clarify the field's distinctive contributions. It proposes some potential and integrative agendas that link empirical investigation with critical reflection and connect technical engagement to sociological theory. By mapping its boundaries and identifying its gaps, the sociology of AI can move from fragmentation toward a more comprehensive dialog to shape the social worlds that AI continues to transform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociology Compass
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70201
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sociology of AI as an Emerging Field: Mapping Tensions and Boundaries

Canhui Liu
Sociology Compass
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Sociology of AI as an Emerging Field: Mapping Tensions and Boundaries

Canhui Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The expanding role of artificial intelligence (AI) in social life compels a foundational reassessment of sociology's concepts, methods, and theoretical commitments. From generative language models to predictive policing, AI systems are no longer mere tools but increasingly agentic, opaque, and normative sociotechnical actors. This article identifies two central tensions that currently define the field: (1) diverse approaches of “sociology on AI” (critical analyses of AI's social impacts) versus “AI for sociology” (instrumental uses of AI in research), and (2) an analytical divide between externalist perspectives focusing on AI's societal consequences and internalist perspectives examining AI's inner workings. Rather than resolving these differences under a single framework, the article argues that recognizing and bridging them can help clarify the field's distinctive contributions. It proposes some potential and integrative agendas that link empirical investigation with critical reflection and connect technical engagement to sociological theory. By mapping its boundaries and identifying its gaps, the sociology of AI can move from fragmentation toward a more comprehensive dialog to shape the social worlds that AI continues to transform.

Sociology CompassVol. 20(5)
University of Cambridge (GB), Bridge University (SS), The London College (GB), University College London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.