The New Natural Law Theory and Alasdair MacIntyre’s Moral Philosophy: A Rapprochement

Abstract The New Natural Law Theory and the moral philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre have both contributed to the revival of Aristotelian–Thomistic moral philosophy in the twentieth century, and to bringing the Aristotelian–Thomistic tradition into conversation with contemporary analytic moral philosophy. While New Natural Law Theory and MacIntyre both seek to defend a robust understanding of practical rationality against the emaciated view of practical rationality typical of Hume and his modern heirs, many (including, sometimes, MacIntyre himself) tend to see the two approaches as fundamentally at odds with one another, at least in some respects. In this essay, I would like to challenge this perception, and argue instead that these two approaches are essentially compatible and complement one another in important ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Jurisprudence
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auag009
Primary Topic
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The New Natural Law Theory and Alasdair MacIntyre’s Moral Philosophy: A Rapprochement

Melissa Moschella
The American Journal of Jurisprudence
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
article

The New Natural Law Theory and Alasdair MacIntyre’s Moral Philosophy: A Rapprochement

Melissa Moschella
article en

Abstract

Abstract The New Natural Law Theory and the moral philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre have both contributed to the revival of Aristotelian–Thomistic moral philosophy in the twentieth century, and to bringing the Aristotelian–Thomistic tradition into conversation with contemporary analytic moral philosophy. While New Natural Law Theory and MacIntyre both seek to defend a robust understanding of practical rationality against the emaciated view of practical rationality typical of Hume and his modern heirs, many (including, sometimes, MacIntyre himself) tend to see the two approaches as fundamentally at odds with one another, at least in some respects. In this essay, I would like to challenge this perception, and argue instead that these two approaches are essentially compatible and complement one another in important ways.

The American Journal of Jurisprudence
University of Notre Dame (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.