The WHO methodology framework to assess innovative technologies for low-resource settings

Abstract Purpose To present the World Health Organization’s (WHO) multi‑stage methodology used in the 2024 Compendium of Innovative Health Technologies for Low‑Resource Settings and provide a replicable framework for decision‑makers. Methods Α five‑step process is described covering call preparation, open call and screening, multi‑domain assessment, cross‑checking and final approval, and selection. Evidence‑based assessments were conducted across six areas—clinical need, comparison with WHO technical specifications (MeDevIS), regulatory status (WHO/IMDRF), health technology assessment (HTA), health technology management (HTM), and intellectual property & local production (IP/LP)—using standardized forms and an online innovations assessment database. Evaluations were iterated with feedback from WHO staff and the Strategic Advisory Group on Medical Devices and Health Technologies (STAG MEDEV). Results In the 2023/24 cycle, 225 submissions were received; 62 technologies underwent full evaluation by multidisciplinary external panels. Following deliberation and validation, 28 technologies were listed (13 commercially available, 3 newly commercialized, 4 prototypes, 1 reassessment, and 7 minor updates), reflecting transparent criteria and consensus‑driven decisions. Conclusions The WHO methodology operationalizes rigorous, transparent, and context‑appropriate evaluation of health technologies for low‑resource settings. By integrating clinical, regulatory, economic, managerial, and IP/LP perspectives, it supports adoption decisions that balance effectiveness, feasibility, and sustainability. The standardized tools and workflows are readily adaptable by ministries of health and procurement bodies to strengthen technology selection processes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Technology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-026-01069-8
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The WHO methodology framework to assess innovative technologies for low-resource settings

Daniela Rodriguez Rodriguez, César Vieira, Nicolas Pallikarakis, Sara K. Liaghati-Mobarhan et al.
Health and Technology
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

The WHO methodology framework to assess innovative technologies for low-resource settings

Daniela Rodriguez Rodriguez, César Vieira, Nicolas Pallikarakis, Sara K. Liaghati-Mobarhan, Einstein Albert Kesi, Aris Dermitzakis, Sasikala Devi Thangavelu, Jillian Reichenbach Ott, Debjani Mueller, Luis Mario Juarez, Adriana Velazquez Berumen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To present the World Health Organization’s (WHO) multi‑stage methodology used in the 2024 Compendium of Innovative Health Technologies for Low‑Resource Settings and provide a replicable framework for decision‑makers. Methods Α five‑step process is described covering call preparation, open call and screening, multi‑domain assessment, cross‑checking and final approval, and selection. Evidence‑based assessments were conducted across six areas—clinical need, comparison with WHO technical specifications (MeDevIS), regulatory status (WHO/IMDRF), health technology assessment (HTA), health technology management (HTM), and intellectual property & local production (IP/LP)—using standardized forms and an online innovations assessment database. Evaluations were iterated with feedback from WHO staff and the Strategic Advisory Group on Medical Devices and Health Technologies (STAG MEDEV). Results In the 2023/24 cycle, 225 submissions were received; 62 technologies underwent full evaluation by multidisciplinary external panels. Following deliberation and validation, 28 technologies were listed (13 commercially available, 3 newly commercialized, 4 prototypes, 1 reassessment, and 7 minor updates), reflecting transparent criteria and consensus‑driven decisions. Conclusions The WHO methodology operationalizes rigorous, transparent, and context‑appropriate evaluation of health technologies for low‑resource settings. By integrating clinical, regulatory, economic, managerial, and IP/LP perspectives, it supports adoption decisions that balance effectiveness, feasibility, and sustainability. The standardized tools and workflows are readily adaptable by ministries of health and procurement bodies to strengthen technology selection processes.

Health and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.