From Risk Stratification to Prevention of Myocardial Infarction: Integrating Imaging and Biomarkers in the Perioperative Setting

Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) remain major causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality, yet optimal perioperative cardiovascular risk stratification remains challenging. This narrative review examines how cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers may be integrated to improve perioperative risk assessment and to support more individualized preventive strategies in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. We reviewed major clinical guidelines, landmark perioperative cohort studies, and key investigations addressing coronary computed tomography angiography, coronary calcium burden, natriuretic peptides, and cardiac troponin in the perioperative setting. Available evidence suggests that imaging and biomarkers provide complementary information, with imaging primarily reflecting structural coronary disease burden and biomarkers reflecting myocardial stress, biological vulnerability, and perioperative injury. Such multimodal assessment may refine risk estimation beyond conventional clinical indices alone, particularly in selected intermediate-risk patients or those with uncertain functional capacity. However, important limitations remain. Current evidence is heterogeneous across study populations, testing strategies, and endpoints, and standardized pathways for integrating imaging and biomarkers into routine clinical decision-making are not yet established. In addition, cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and the extent to which improved risk discrimination translates into better perioperative outcomes remain uncertain. Overall, the integration of imaging and biomarkers offers a clinically relevant framework for moving from perioperative risk stratification toward prevention, but its practical implementation and outcome benefit require further prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14051023
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Risk Stratification to Prevention of Myocardial Infarction: Integrating Imaging and Biomarkers in the Perioperative Setting

Jeong Yoon Jang, Hye-Ree Kim, Han Ra Choi, H A Lee et al.
Biomedicines
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

From Risk Stratification to Prevention of Myocardial Infarction: Integrating Imaging and Biomarkers in the Perioperative Setting

Jeong Yoon Jang, Hye-Ree Kim, Han Ra Choi, H A Lee, Jeong Rang Park, Y H Cho, Jin-Yong Hwang, Yujin Shin, Y N Kim, Kye-Hwan Kim, Sung-Eun Park, Min Gyu Kang, Jong-Hwa Ahn, Jae Seok Bae
article en

Abstract

Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) remain major causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality, yet optimal perioperative cardiovascular risk stratification remains challenging. This narrative review examines how cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers may be integrated to improve perioperative risk assessment and to support more individualized preventive strategies in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. We reviewed major clinical guidelines, landmark perioperative cohort studies, and key investigations addressing coronary computed tomography angiography, coronary calcium burden, natriuretic peptides, and cardiac troponin in the perioperative setting. Available evidence suggests that imaging and biomarkers provide complementary information, with imaging primarily reflecting structural coronary disease burden and biomarkers reflecting myocardial stress, biological vulnerability, and perioperative injury. Such multimodal assessment may refine risk estimation beyond conventional clinical indices alone, particularly in selected intermediate-risk patients or those with uncertain functional capacity. However, important limitations remain. Current evidence is heterogeneous across study populations, testing strategies, and endpoints, and standardized pathways for integrating imaging and biomarkers into routine clinical decision-making are not yet established. In addition, cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and the extent to which improved risk discrimination translates into better perioperative outcomes remain uncertain. Overall, the integration of imaging and biomarkers offers a clinically relevant framework for moving from perioperative risk stratification toward prevention, but its practical implementation and outcome benefit require further prospective validation.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(5)
Changwon National University (KR), Gyeongsang National University Hospital (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.