Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Suspected Native Spinal Brucella Infection: A Multicenter Study

Objective: The aim is to study the diagnostic positive rates of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), microbial culture, and serologic testing in suspected native spinal brucellosis, and to evaluate the clinical value of their combined application. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective observational study, 128 patients with suspected native spinal brucellosis from 6 medical centers (February 2020 to February 2025) were enrolled. Specimens from infection sites were subjected to microbial culture, mNGS, and serological testing (agglutination test). Results: Of the 128 patients with suspected native spinal Brucella infections, 118 patients were diagnosed with Brucella spondylitis. Among the 118 confirmed Brucella spondylitis cases, mNGS demonstrated a positivity rate of 92.37% (109 of 118), significantly higher than that of culture (26.27%, 31 of 118) and agglutination test (83.05%, 98 of 118). In the 87 culture-negative samples, mNGS detected Brucella in 91.95% (80 of 87), compared to 82.76% (72 of 87) by agglutination test. mNGS confirmed Brucella infection in all 16 cases that were agglutination test negative. mNGS combined with agglutination tests can effectively complement each other, improving the sensitivity of diagnosis and thereby minimizing missed diagnoses to the greatest extent. Among the 10 nonbrucellar spinal pathologies, agglutination test showed a high false-positive rate of 90% (9 of 10), whereas mNGS had a 10% (1 of 10) false-positive rate. Therefore, the agglutination test has a relatively high rate of false positives. Conclusion: mNGS detection represents an effective adjunct to microbial culture and the agglutination test. The concurrent use of all 3 methods enhances diagnostic accuracy and reduces the likelihood of missed and incorrect diagnoses, significantly improving patient prognosis and guiding personalized clinical treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurospine
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2551698.849
Primary Topic
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Suspected Native Spinal Brucella Infection: A Multicenter Study

H F Wang, Shenshen Hao, Q Y Liu, X M Chen et al.
Neurospine
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
article

Diagnostic Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Suspected Native Spinal Brucella Infection: A Multicenter Study

H F Wang, Shenshen Hao, Q Y Liu, X M Chen, Tingting Tian, Litao Li, Zhaohui Li, Yuhan Lin, Yue Wang, Jiaming Liu, Peishan Cong, Hongqi Zhan, Xinkai Pu, Xiang Yu, Xiaofeng Lian, Feng Shen, Tao Peng, Zengshuai Han, Qiang Zhang, Ting Wang, Zehua Zhang, Wenqiao Wang, Chuqiang Yin
article en

Abstract

Objective: The aim is to study the diagnostic positive rates of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), microbial culture, and serologic testing in suspected native spinal brucellosis, and to evaluate the clinical value of their combined application. Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective observational study, 128 patients with suspected native spinal brucellosis from 6 medical centers (February 2020 to February 2025) were enrolled. Specimens from infection sites were subjected to microbial culture, mNGS, and serological testing (agglutination test). Results: Of the 128 patients with suspected native spinal Brucella infections, 118 patients were diagnosed with Brucella spondylitis. Among the 118 confirmed Brucella spondylitis cases, mNGS demonstrated a positivity rate of 92.37% (109 of 118), significantly higher than that of culture (26.27%, 31 of 118) and agglutination test (83.05%, 98 of 118). In the 87 culture-negative samples, mNGS detected Brucella in 91.95% (80 of 87), compared to 82.76% (72 of 87) by agglutination test. mNGS confirmed Brucella infection in all 16 cases that were agglutination test negative. mNGS combined with agglutination tests can effectively complement each other, improving the sensitivity of diagnosis and thereby minimizing missed diagnoses to the greatest extent. Among the 10 nonbrucellar spinal pathologies, agglutination test showed a high false-positive rate of 90% (9 of 10), whereas mNGS had a 10% (1 of 10) false-positive rate. Therefore, the agglutination test has a relatively high rate of false positives. Conclusion: mNGS detection represents an effective adjunct to microbial culture and the agglutination test. The concurrent use of all 3 methods enhances diagnostic accuracy and reduces the likelihood of missed and incorrect diagnoses, significantly improving patient prognosis and guiding personalized clinical treatment.

NeurospineVol. 23(2)
Qingdao University (CN), Fujian Medical University (CN), Nanchang University (CN), Army Medical University (CN), Shandong University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), Qingdao Mental Health Center (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi Medical College (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN), Fuzhou Second Hospital (CN), Southwest Hospital (CN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Qingdao Center of Resource Chemistry and New Materials (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Qingdao, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.