Software Development Process Model for Machine Learning and Evolving Variants: A Systematic Literature Review

Adoption of machine learning (ML) across diverse domains demands a systematic development approach. ML development differs from traditional software development due to its data-driven and iterative nature. Using Kitchenham’s protocol, this systematic literature review (SLR) aims to synthesize existing literature on development processes tailored for ML systems and evolving variants. Models are categorized by lifecycle phases, granularity and support for traceability and continuous deployment. Emerging trends include hybrid and fine-grained approaches bridging academia and industry. Key gaps include limited empirical validation and lack of standardized practices covering ML variants. This review serves as a base to develop reliable and maintainable ML systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218194026300010
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Software Development Process Model for Machine Learning and Evolving Variants: A Systematic Literature Review

Adnan Ahmad, DR. FARRUKH ZESHAN, Sabih Jamal
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Software Development Process Model for Machine Learning and Evolving Variants: A Systematic Literature Review

Adnan Ahmad, DR. FARRUKH ZESHAN, Sabih Jamal
article en

Abstract

Adoption of machine learning (ML) across diverse domains demands a systematic development approach. ML development differs from traditional software development due to its data-driven and iterative nature. Using Kitchenham’s protocol, this systematic literature review (SLR) aims to synthesize existing literature on development processes tailored for ML systems and evolving variants. Models are categorized by lifecycle phases, granularity and support for traceability and continuous deployment. Emerging trends include hybrid and fine-grained approaches bridging academia and industry. Key gaps include limited empirical validation and lack of standardized practices covering ML variants. This review serves as a base to develop reliable and maintainable ML systems.

International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.