Effects of Planting Configuration on the Growth, Physiology, Nutrient Dynamics, and Yield of Apple Ber ( <i>Ziziphus mauritiana</i> Lamk)

High‐density planting systems have revolutionized farming around the world, as these orchards provide early fruit bearing with sustained quality production. Owing to the wider spacing of plantations in the Apple ber ( Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.), the land remains unused as the plant canopy gradually increases over time. In this study, the saplings were planted in different configurations, viz., 5 m × 5 m (400 plants/ha), 5 m × 4 m (500 plants/ha) and 5 m × 3 m (665 plants/ha), at the Regional Research Station, CCSHAU Bawal (Haryana), India, and pooled data from 6 years, 2019–25, revealed that plant height was significantly greater at closer spacings (5 m × 3 m) because light competition tends toward vertical growth, whereas the trunk cross‐sectional area (TCSA) and canopy volume reached a maximum at wider spacings (5 m × 5 m) because of less competition for light and nutrients and better utilization of resources. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intensity was highest at the 5 m × 5 m spacing; however, the leaf area index (LAI) (2.6) reached a maximum at the 5 m × 4 m spacing, indicating the optimum canopy density for photosynthesis. The highest chlorophyl content (293.2 µmol m −2 ) and nutrient concentration (N: 2.75%, P: 0.23%, K: 1.79%) were found in the 5 m × 5 m spacing. Fruit weight (39.84 g) and fruit length (54.2 mm) were significantly greater at the 5 m × 5 m spacing; however, the TSS was not significantly affected by the treatments. The soil physico‐chemical properties remained unaffected by the different planting densities. Compared with narrow spacing, per‐plant fruit yield was highest at wider spacings. However, on the basis of area, the highest fruit yield (83.18 q/ha) was under the 5 m × 3 m spacing, with the highest B:C ratio, compared with the 5 m × 5 m spacing (52.88 q/ha). Therefore, it may be concluded that closer spacing of 5 m × 3 m may be preferable in Apple ber plantations for better productivity and net returns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nzc2.70175
Primary Topic
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Planting Configuration on the Growth, Physiology, Nutrient Dynamics, and Yield of Apple Ber ( Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk)

Vikas Gill, M Santhosh Kumar, Arvind Malik, Anuradha Bishnoi et al.
New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
article

Effects of Planting Configuration on the Growth, Physiology, Nutrient Dynamics, and Yield of Apple Ber ( Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk)

Vikas Gill, M Santhosh Kumar, Arvind Malik, Anuradha Bishnoi, Rakesh Kumar, Krishan Kant Meena
article en

Abstract

High‐density planting systems have revolutionized farming around the world, as these orchards provide early fruit bearing with sustained quality production. Owing to the wider spacing of plantations in the Apple ber ( Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.), the land remains unused as the plant canopy gradually increases over time. In this study, the saplings were planted in different configurations, viz., 5 m × 5 m (400 plants/ha), 5 m × 4 m (500 plants/ha) and 5 m × 3 m (665 plants/ha), at the Regional Research Station, CCSHAU Bawal (Haryana), India, and pooled data from 6 years, 2019–25, revealed that plant height was significantly greater at closer spacings (5 m × 3 m) because light competition tends toward vertical growth, whereas the trunk cross‐sectional area (TCSA) and canopy volume reached a maximum at wider spacings (5 m × 5 m) because of less competition for light and nutrients and better utilization of resources. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intensity was highest at the 5 m × 5 m spacing; however, the leaf area index (LAI) (2.6) reached a maximum at the 5 m × 4 m spacing, indicating the optimum canopy density for photosynthesis. The highest chlorophyl content (293.2 µmol m −2 ) and nutrient concentration (N: 2.75%, P: 0.23%, K: 1.79%) were found in the 5 m × 5 m spacing. Fruit weight (39.84 g) and fruit length (54.2 mm) were significantly greater at the 5 m × 5 m spacing; however, the TSS was not significantly affected by the treatments. The soil physico‐chemical properties remained unaffected by the different planting densities. Compared with narrow spacing, per‐plant fruit yield was highest at wider spacings. However, on the basis of area, the highest fruit yield (83.18 q/ha) was under the 5 m × 3 m spacing, with the highest B:C ratio, compared with the 5 m × 5 m spacing (52.88 q/ha). Therefore, it may be concluded that closer spacing of 5 m × 3 m may be preferable in Apple ber plantations for better productivity and net returns.

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural ScienceVol. 54(2)
Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.