Additive Biomass and Carbon Models for Bambusa emeiensis L.C.Chia & H.L.Fung: A Multi-Regional Study in Southwestern China

Bamboo plantations are increasingly recognized as significant terrestrial carbon sinks, yet accurate estimation of biomass and carbon stocks requires species-specific, regionally validated allometric models. Bambusa emeiensis L.C.Chia & H.L.Fung (ci bamboo) is among the most ecologically and economically important clump-forming bamboo species in southwestern China, but robust multi-regional allometric models are lacking. Using destructive sampling data from 127 culms across two major production areas—Sichuan Province (n = 82) and Guizhou Province (n = 45)—we developed additive biomass and carbon storage model systems enforcing mathematical additivity via nonlinear seemingly unrelated regression (NSUR). Allometric equations used diameter at breast height (D), culm height (H), and compound variables (DH, D2H) as predictors. Regional models achieved Ra2 of 0.0879–0.8320 total relative error (TRE): −0.99% to 0.04% for biomass and Ra2 of 0.0923–0.8282 (TRE: −1.01% to 0.03%) for carbon storage; culm and total aboveground models attained Ra2 ≥ 0.52. Organ-level carbon content (40.79%–44.46%) was significantly lower than the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) default of 50% (one-sample t-test, p < 0.01 for all organs), with Sichuan values exceeding Guizhou values (independent-samples t-test, p < 0.01), indicating that use of the default would overestimate carbon stocks by 12%–22%. Cross-regional validation revealed prediction biases of up to ±19.24% when applying single-region models outside their training area, whereas the combined model held errors within ±11.36% for biomass and ±8.49% for carbon storage. External validation using 32 independent culms from Hunan, Yunnan, and Chongqing confirmed the robustness of the combined model (TRE: −6.30% to 4.27%). A key limitation is that belowground biomass was not measured. The established models provide scientifically rigorous and practically applicable tools for regional carbon accounting of B. emeiensis plantations under China’s national greenhouse gas inventory framework and for informing sustainable bamboo management planning, and demonstrate that species- and region-specific carbon fractions are essential for accurate carbon stock assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f17050559
Primary Topic
Bamboo properties and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additive Biomass and Carbon Models for Bambusa emeiensis L.C.Chia & H.L.Fung: A Multi-Regional Study in Southwestern China

Guanglu Liu, Xiaopeng Shi, Shuguang Li, Miao Liu et al.
Forests
Bamboo properties and applications
article

Additive Biomass and Carbon Models for Bambusa emeiensis L.C.Chia & H.L.Fung: A Multi-Regional Study in Southwestern China

Guanglu Liu, Xiaopeng Shi, Shuguang Li, Miao Liu, Chunju Cai, Shaohui Fan
article en

Abstract

Bamboo plantations are increasingly recognized as significant terrestrial carbon sinks, yet accurate estimation of biomass and carbon stocks requires species-specific, regionally validated allometric models. Bambusa emeiensis L.C.Chia & H.L.Fung (ci bamboo) is among the most ecologically and economically important clump-forming bamboo species in southwestern China, but robust multi-regional allometric models are lacking. Using destructive sampling data from 127 culms across two major production areas—Sichuan Province (n = 82) and Guizhou Province (n = 45)—we developed additive biomass and carbon storage model systems enforcing mathematical additivity via nonlinear seemingly unrelated regression (NSUR). Allometric equations used diameter at breast height (D), culm height (H), and compound variables (DH, D2H) as predictors. Regional models achieved Ra2 of 0.0879–0.8320 total relative error (TRE): −0.99% to 0.04% for biomass and Ra2 of 0.0923–0.8282 (TRE: −1.01% to 0.03%) for carbon storage; culm and total aboveground models attained Ra2 ≥ 0.52. Organ-level carbon content (40.79%–44.46%) was significantly lower than the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) default of 50% (one-sample t-test, p < 0.01 for all organs), with Sichuan values exceeding Guizhou values (independent-samples t-test, p < 0.01), indicating that use of the default would overestimate carbon stocks by 12%–22%. Cross-regional validation revealed prediction biases of up to ±19.24% when applying single-region models outside their training area, whereas the combined model held errors within ±11.36% for biomass and ±8.49% for carbon storage. External validation using 32 independent culms from Hunan, Yunnan, and Chongqing confirmed the robustness of the combined model (TRE: −6.30% to 4.27%). A key limitation is that belowground biomass was not measured. The established models provide scientifically rigorous and practically applicable tools for regional carbon accounting of B. emeiensis plantations under China’s national greenhouse gas inventory framework and for informing sustainable bamboo management planning, and demonstrate that species- and region-specific carbon fractions are essential for accurate carbon stock assessments.

ForestsVol. 17(5)
International Bamboo and Rattan Organization (CN), State Forestry and Grassland Administration (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bamboo properties and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.