Perspectives of Information Access in the Informed Consent Process for Clinical Research Participation in Australia

Access to communication and information during the informed consent process for clinical research is essential for empowered decision-making. To build awareness of accessibility practices, this study aimed to explore current enablers and barriers experienced by potential research participants during informed consent procedures. A multimodal survey, capturing quantitative and qualitative data, was distributed through industry networks in Australia. The survey was open to people who had been involved in an informed consent process for a clinical research study. We collected survey data from August 2024 to January 2025. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, while qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis, with barriers and facilitators mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Half of the respondents (52%) disclosed having an information access challenge impacted by vision, intersectional disability, or neurodiversity. Five themes around information access were identified: communication, information quality, assistive technology, trusted supports, and information intervals. Our research highlights some suggested actions that can support researchers and research organizations in providing accessible communication and information formats, thereby enhancing equity and inclusion in informed consent practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics & Human Research
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.70011
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives of Information Access in the Informed Consent Process for Clinical Research Participation in Australia

Fleur O’Hare, Kelly Schulz, Tessa Saunders, Michelle Gallaher et al.
Ethics & Human Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Perspectives of Information Access in the Informed Consent Process for Clinical Research Participation in Australia

Fleur O’Hare, Kelly Schulz, Tessa Saunders, Michelle Gallaher, Camille Paynter, Steven Y. C. Tong, David Foran, Lauren N. Ayton, Myra B. McGuinness, Lauren Barina
article en

Abstract

Access to communication and information during the informed consent process for clinical research is essential for empowered decision-making. To build awareness of accessibility practices, this study aimed to explore current enablers and barriers experienced by potential research participants during informed consent procedures. A multimodal survey, capturing quantitative and qualitative data, was distributed through industry networks in Australia. The survey was open to people who had been involved in an informed consent process for a clinical research study. We collected survey data from August 2024 to January 2025. Quantitative data were reported descriptively, while qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis, with barriers and facilitators mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Half of the respondents (52%) disclosed having an information access challenge impacted by vision, intersectional disability, or neurodiversity. Five themes around information access were identified: communication, information quality, assistive technology, trusted supports, and information intervals. Our research highlights some suggested actions that can support researchers and research organizations in providing accessible communication and information formats, thereby enhancing equity and inclusion in informed consent practices.

Ethics & Human ResearchVol. 48(3)
Mercer (Czechia) (CZ), Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian College of Optometry (AU), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Centre for Eye Research Australia (AU), Los Angeles Clinical Trials (US), Melbourne Health (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.