Downward Positive Leader Propagation Modes and Their Effects in Positive Cloud‐to‐Ground Lightning Characteristics

Abstract The return stroke in a cloud‐to‐ground (CG) flash is initiated when the downward leader either reaches the ground or connects with an upward leader from a grounded structure. Unlike negative downward leaders, which typically propagate in a highly branched manner, downward positive leaders (DPLs) can propagate either in a branched or unbranched fashion. High‐speed camera recordings show that some DPLs exhibit faint channels accompanied by multiple recoil leaders (RLs)—small bipolar and bidirectional plasma channels—that repeatedly retrace these channels as the leader propagates toward the ground prior to the return stroke (RS). Other leaders, however, consist of a single bright channel with no occurrence of RLs. This study compares the physical characteristics of these two types of DPLs and examines how their propagation modes influence other properties of positive cloud‐to‐ground (+CG) lightning. We show that leaders without RLs propagate significantly faster and are followed by RSs with much higher peak current (I p ) values, on average about twice those associated with leaders accompanied by recoil leaders. The final speed of leaders without RLs exhibits a very strong correlation ( R = 0.91) with the RS peak current. The duration of the continuing current (CC) following the RSs is similar for both cases, although there is a slight tendency for longer durations when RLs are present. Analysis of multiple‐stroke +CG lightning flashes with different ground terminations shows that leaders initiating successive strokes can propagate in markedly different ways within time intervals as short as 15 ms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd046179
Primary Topic
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Downward Positive Leader Propagation Modes and Their Effects in Positive Cloud‐to‐Ground Lightning Characteristics

Tom A. Warner, Listz Araújo, José Claudio O. Silva, Marcelo M. F. Saba et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
article

Downward Positive Leader Propagation Modes and Their Effects in Positive Cloud‐to‐Ground Lightning Characteristics

Tom A. Warner, Listz Araújo, José Claudio O. Silva, Marcelo M. F. Saba, Diego R. R. da Silva, Ivan T. Cruz, Miguel B. Guimarães Neto, Rasha U. Abbasi, Ny T. Kieu, João Carlos M. Alves, Gabriel S. Diniz, Paola B. Lauria, Tagianne P. da Silva, Giovane B. Suss
article en

Abstract

Abstract The return stroke in a cloud‐to‐ground (CG) flash is initiated when the downward leader either reaches the ground or connects with an upward leader from a grounded structure. Unlike negative downward leaders, which typically propagate in a highly branched manner, downward positive leaders (DPLs) can propagate either in a branched or unbranched fashion. High‐speed camera recordings show that some DPLs exhibit faint channels accompanied by multiple recoil leaders (RLs)—small bipolar and bidirectional plasma channels—that repeatedly retrace these channels as the leader propagates toward the ground prior to the return stroke (RS). Other leaders, however, consist of a single bright channel with no occurrence of RLs. This study compares the physical characteristics of these two types of DPLs and examines how their propagation modes influence other properties of positive cloud‐to‐ground (+CG) lightning. We show that leaders without RLs propagate significantly faster and are followed by RSs with much higher peak current (I p ) values, on average about twice those associated with leaders accompanied by recoil leaders. The final speed of leaders without RLs exhibits a very strong correlation ( R = 0.91) with the RS peak current. The duration of the continuing current (CC) following the RSs is similar for both cases, although there is a slight tendency for longer durations when RLs are present. Analysis of multiple‐stroke +CG lightning flashes with different ground terminations shows that leaders initiating successive strokes can propagate in markedly different ways within time intervals as short as 15 ms.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(9)
Loyola University Chicago (US), Van Lang University (VN), Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (BR), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
National Science Foundation, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.