Effects of different exercise interventions on quality of life in breast cancer survivors after treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background With more than 7.8 million breast cancer survivors worldwide and five-year survival rates approaching 90%, optimizing quality of life (QoL) has become a central priority in survivorship care. Exercise is a cornerstone non-pharmacological intervention; however, current guidelines lack modality-specific evidence, and existing meta-analyses often rely on overly broad classifications that obscure clinically meaningful differences among exercise types. Methods This systematic review involved comprehensive searches of six electronic databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Scopus) from inception through October 2025. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated how exercise interventions affect QoL in breast cancer survivors. Using frequentist network meta-analysis, we synthesized the evidence to determine which exercise modalities demonstrated superior effectiveness across the included RCTs. Results Sixty-nine randomized controlled trials involving 5,294 breast cancer survivors from 19 countries met the inclusion criteria. All exercise modalities except high-intensity interval training and Pilates were associated with significant improvements in QoL compared with usual care. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses identified combined exercise as the most effective modality (SMD = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.95–1.86; SUCRA = 95.4%), followed by Tai Chi (SMD = 0.98, SUCRA = 71.5%), aerobic exercise (SMD = 0.79, SUCRA = 63.4%), Qigong (SMD = 0.77, SUCRA = 60.1%), yoga (SMD = 0.58, SUCRA = 45.4%), and resistance training (SMD = 0.54, SUCRA = 42.1%). Conclusions Combined exercise integrating aerobic and resistance components provides the greatest improvement in QoL among breast cancer survivors. These findings offer hierarchical, modality-specific evidence to support personalized exercise prescription in survivorship care. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251173721 , identifier CRD420251173721.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1775358
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of different exercise interventions on quality of life in breast cancer survivors after treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Hao Chen, Song Qiao, Yuanxing Wang, Haitao Zhan et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Effects of different exercise interventions on quality of life in breast cancer survivors after treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Hao Chen, Song Qiao, Yuanxing Wang, Haitao Zhan, Xiangyu Zhao, Yanbo Yi
article en

Abstract

Background With more than 7.8 million breast cancer survivors worldwide and five-year survival rates approaching 90%, optimizing quality of life (QoL) has become a central priority in survivorship care. Exercise is a cornerstone non-pharmacological intervention; however, current guidelines lack modality-specific evidence, and existing meta-analyses often rely on overly broad classifications that obscure clinically meaningful differences among exercise types. Methods This systematic review involved comprehensive searches of six electronic databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Scopus) from inception through October 2025. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated how exercise interventions affect QoL in breast cancer survivors. Using frequentist network meta-analysis, we synthesized the evidence to determine which exercise modalities demonstrated superior effectiveness across the included RCTs. Results Sixty-nine randomized controlled trials involving 5,294 breast cancer survivors from 19 countries met the inclusion criteria. All exercise modalities except high-intensity interval training and Pilates were associated with significant improvements in QoL compared with usual care. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses identified combined exercise as the most effective modality (SMD = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.95–1.86; SUCRA = 95.4%), followed by Tai Chi (SMD = 0.98, SUCRA = 71.5%), aerobic exercise (SMD = 0.79, SUCRA = 63.4%), Qigong (SMD = 0.77, SUCRA = 60.1%), yoga (SMD = 0.58, SUCRA = 45.4%), and resistance training (SMD = 0.54, SUCRA = 42.1%). Conclusions Combined exercise integrating aerobic and resistance components provides the greatest improvement in QoL among breast cancer survivors. These findings offer hierarchical, modality-specific evidence to support personalized exercise prescription in survivorship care. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251173721 , identifier CRD420251173721.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Zibo Vocational Institute (CN), Dongshin University (KR), Yantai University (CN), Kyung Hee University (KR), National Police Academy (JP), Police Department (LT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.