Firefighters’ Expertise in Locating Sounds

Background: Firefighters search for survivors in low-visibility environments and have documented expertise in spatial orientation and wayfinding. No studies so far have investigated their ability to make use of auditory spatial cues. Methods: The performance of 41 professional firefighters and 24 control subjects to localise sounds played in a dark environment at 9 azimuthal positions was assessed using (i) meaningless single sounds and (ii) meaningful sounds presented with two simultaneous distractors. Localisation errors were analysed with a 3-way ANOVA Task × Position × Group. Results: The analysis yielded significant main effects of Task, Position and Group. The localisation errors tended to be smaller when localising meaningless single sounds (main effect Task), for items presented at central as compared to peripheral positions (main effect Position), and by firefighters rather than controls (main effect Group). The interactions Position × Group and Task × Position were significant; firefighters performed more accurately at peripheral positions than controls, and meaningless single sounds yielded fewer localisation errors at the periphery than meaningful sounds presented with distractors. Conclusions: Professional firefighters perform better than controls at explicit localisation of sounds, including in conditions where sound objects need to be segregated from distractors by spatial cues. These results suggest that firefighters have acquired expertise in the explicit and implicit use of auditory spatial cues. The proficiency of firefighters needs to be taken into consideration when planning and carrying out interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16050492
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firefighters’ Expertise in Locating Sounds

Isabel Tissieres, Stéphanie Clarke, Sonia Crottaz‐Herbette
Brain Sciences
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Firefighters’ Expertise in Locating Sounds

Isabel Tissieres, Stéphanie Clarke, Sonia Crottaz‐Herbette
article en

Abstract

Background: Firefighters search for survivors in low-visibility environments and have documented expertise in spatial orientation and wayfinding. No studies so far have investigated their ability to make use of auditory spatial cues. Methods: The performance of 41 professional firefighters and 24 control subjects to localise sounds played in a dark environment at 9 azimuthal positions was assessed using (i) meaningless single sounds and (ii) meaningful sounds presented with two simultaneous distractors. Localisation errors were analysed with a 3-way ANOVA Task × Position × Group. Results: The analysis yielded significant main effects of Task, Position and Group. The localisation errors tended to be smaller when localising meaningless single sounds (main effect Task), for items presented at central as compared to peripheral positions (main effect Position), and by firefighters rather than controls (main effect Group). The interactions Position × Group and Task × Position were significant; firefighters performed more accurately at peripheral positions than controls, and meaningless single sounds yielded fewer localisation errors at the periphery than meaningful sounds presented with distractors. Conclusions: Professional firefighters perform better than controls at explicit localisation of sounds, including in conditions where sound objects need to be segregated from distractors by spatial cues. These results suggest that firefighters have acquired expertise in the explicit and implicit use of auditory spatial cues. The proficiency of firefighters needs to be taken into consideration when planning and carrying out interventions.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(5)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.