Machine Learning-Based Classification of Gliomas and Tumor Grades with SHAP-Guided Feature Interpretation

Background: Gliomas are among the most common and heterogeneous primary brain tumors, exhibiting substantial molecular and transcriptomic diversity that complicates diagnosis, grading, and treatment planning. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML), offer powerful opportunities to analyze high-dimensional gene expression data and support precision oncology. Methods: This study proposes an interpretable ML framework to classify brain tumor subtypes—glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma—and to predict tumor grades (2, 3, and 4) using microarray-based gene expression data. The analysis was conducted on the REMBRANDT dataset, comprising 464 labeled samples (221 glioblastoma, 148 astrocytoma, 67 oligodendroglioma, and 28 controls) and 314 tumor samples for grade classification. Results: The ML models achieved high performance for disease classification, with accuracies of 99.6% (AUC 99.89%) for glioblastoma, 98.3% (AUC 99.83%) for astrocytoma, and 98.95% (AUC 100%) for oligodendroglioma. Tumor grade predictions also performed strongly, achieving 83.7% accuracy (AUC 88.2%) for grade II vs. III, 91.3% (AUC 94.8%) for grade II vs. IV, and 84.2% (AUC 90.8%) for grade III vs. IV. SHAP analysis identified key genes contributing to the model predictions (e.g., WIF1, STX6, RGS5, and ACTR2), and KEGG enrichment identified the candidate pathways involved in vesicular transport, metabolism, and immune signaling. Conclusion: Overall, our findings demonstrate that interpretable ML models can accurately differentiate glioma subtypes and grades, and SHAP analysis can help identify the strongest predictors of our models. These findings provide additional insights into the heterogeneous genetic and molecular landscape of brain gliomas and are intended to complement, not replace, conventional histopathological diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17050511
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Gliomas and Tumor Grades with SHAP-Guided Feature Interpretation

Md. Sakib Abrar Hossain, Md. Shaheenur Islam Sumon, Tahmid Zaman Raad, Marwan Malluhi et al.
Genes
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Gliomas and Tumor Grades with SHAP-Guided Feature Interpretation

Md. Sakib Abrar Hossain, Md. Shaheenur Islam Sumon, Tahmid Zaman Raad, Marwan Malluhi, Ghaya Al-Rumaihi, Ahmed Hassanein, Muhammad E. H. Chowdhury, Shona Pedersen, Rozaimi Razali
article en

Abstract

Background: Gliomas are among the most common and heterogeneous primary brain tumors, exhibiting substantial molecular and transcriptomic diversity that complicates diagnosis, grading, and treatment planning. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML), offer powerful opportunities to analyze high-dimensional gene expression data and support precision oncology. Methods: This study proposes an interpretable ML framework to classify brain tumor subtypes—glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma—and to predict tumor grades (2, 3, and 4) using microarray-based gene expression data. The analysis was conducted on the REMBRANDT dataset, comprising 464 labeled samples (221 glioblastoma, 148 astrocytoma, 67 oligodendroglioma, and 28 controls) and 314 tumor samples for grade classification. Results: The ML models achieved high performance for disease classification, with accuracies of 99.6% (AUC 99.89%) for glioblastoma, 98.3% (AUC 99.83%) for astrocytoma, and 98.95% (AUC 100%) for oligodendroglioma. Tumor grade predictions also performed strongly, achieving 83.7% accuracy (AUC 88.2%) for grade II vs. III, 91.3% (AUC 94.8%) for grade II vs. IV, and 84.2% (AUC 90.8%) for grade III vs. IV. SHAP analysis identified key genes contributing to the model predictions (e.g., WIF1, STX6, RGS5, and ACTR2), and KEGG enrichment identified the candidate pathways involved in vesicular transport, metabolism, and immune signaling. Conclusion: Overall, our findings demonstrate that interpretable ML models can accurately differentiate glioma subtypes and grades, and SHAP analysis can help identify the strongest predictors of our models. These findings provide additional insights into the heterogeneous genetic and molecular landscape of brain gliomas and are intended to complement, not replace, conventional histopathological diagnosis.

GenesVol. 17(5)
University of Regina (CA), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Qatar University (QA)
Qatar University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.