More Than Words: A Quality Improvement Pilot to Enhance Language-Concordant Care Access [ID 3752]

INTRODUCTION: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) face communication barriers linked to poorer outcomes. Language-concordant care improves outcomes, yet most health systems lack processes to identify, certify, or support providers’ non-English-language skills despite federal protections. This quality improvement pilot assessed language proficiency among obstetrics and gynecology providers and explored strategies to expand access to language-concordant care. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey (July to August 2025) of clinical providers in the University of Michigan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Providers reported non-English proficiency using the Interagency Language Roundtable (ILR) Healthcare Scale and were categorized as native/advanced or English-only. The survey assessed certification, clinical use of language, barriers to certification, and perceived strategies to enhance language-concordant care. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Of 204 eligible providers, 173 (85%) responded; 19 (11%) reported native or advanced proficiency in nine languages, most commonly Spanish (47%). All providers frequently cared for LEP patients, yet 47% of proficient speakers rarely used their language clinically. When matched, 94% reported high satisfaction, although most encounters occurred by chance. Nearly all respondents (96%) supported language-concordant provider matching via the website (94%), portal filters (93%), and call center prompts (94%). Among proficient speakers, only one had completed formal certification testing. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: A clear gap exists between provider language skills and their systematic use in clinical care. Few proficient clinicians were certified, and although providers reported high satisfaction with language-concordant encounters, most occurred by chance. Next steps should evaluate patient satisfaction and outcomes, and test structured approaches to delivering language-concordant care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006268.48
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More Than Words: A Quality Improvement Pilot to Enhance Language-Concordant Care Access [ID 3752]

Dee E. Fenner, Rosalyn Maben-Feaster, Anita Malone, Kamilah M. Davis-Wilson et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

More Than Words: A Quality Improvement Pilot to Enhance Language-Concordant Care Access [ID 3752]

Dee E. Fenner, Rosalyn Maben-Feaster, Anita Malone, Kamilah M. Davis-Wilson, Hema Datwani
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) face communication barriers linked to poorer outcomes. Language-concordant care improves outcomes, yet most health systems lack processes to identify, certify, or support providers’ non-English-language skills despite federal protections. This quality improvement pilot assessed language proficiency among obstetrics and gynecology providers and explored strategies to expand access to language-concordant care. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey (July to August 2025) of clinical providers in the University of Michigan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Providers reported non-English proficiency using the Interagency Language Roundtable (ILR) Healthcare Scale and were categorized as native/advanced or English-only. The survey assessed certification, clinical use of language, barriers to certification, and perceived strategies to enhance language-concordant care. Data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Of 204 eligible providers, 173 (85%) responded; 19 (11%) reported native or advanced proficiency in nine languages, most commonly Spanish (47%). All providers frequently cared for LEP patients, yet 47% of proficient speakers rarely used their language clinically. When matched, 94% reported high satisfaction, although most encounters occurred by chance. Nearly all respondents (96%) supported language-concordant provider matching via the website (94%), portal filters (93%), and call center prompts (94%). Among proficient speakers, only one had completed formal certification testing. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: A clear gap exists between provider language skills and their systematic use in clinical care. Few proficient clinicians were certified, and although providers reported high satisfaction with language-concordant encounters, most occurred by chance. Next steps should evaluate patient satisfaction and outcomes, and test structured approaches to delivering language-concordant care.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 147(5S)
University of Michigan (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.