Translation, Reliability, Psychometric Validation, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Urdu Version of the Self‐Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS‐U) Among Hypertensive Patients in Lahore, Pakistan: A Validation Study

Background: The Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale, also known as SEAMS, is a widely used self-reported measure of confidence in taking medications correctly. However, the scale has not been validated in different languages. Aim: The present study aims to translate and investigate the psychometric properties of the translated version of the scale SEAMS-Urdu (SEAMS-U) administered to hypertensive patients in Lahore, Pakistan, a South Asian country. Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional which enrolled hypertensive patients aged ≥ 18 years. The forward-backward method was employed for translation purposes. Content and face validity were assessed, and construct validity was evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), with convergent validity also assessed. Internal consistency measures such as Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability (over a 4-week interval) were also employed. Results: Of the 1012 participants, the majority of our respondents were male (67.4%) and aged 50 and above (45.5%). The SEAMS-U 13 items had good internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha: 0.878. In item analysis, Cronbach's alpha varied between 0.849 and 0.883, while the values for the two halves of the questionnaire were 0.838 and 0.789, indicating good reliability of the questionnaire. The test-retest reliability analysis was adequate (0.686), while the intra-class correlation (ICC) remained high at 0.814. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) makes a 2-factor model in rotated space that explained 68.162% of the total variation. Later, CFA confirmed the 2-factor model with goodness-of-fit measures indicating an acceptable model fit. Convergent validity was adequate, with the Cronbach's alpha reliability of the 9-item SEAMS-U 2-factor model of 0.886. Conclusion: The SEAMS-U is a valid and reliable measure of self-efficacy for antihypertensive medication in Pakistan. This simple tool can be used to assess the confidence of persons with hypertension outside of the tertiary hospital setting to adhere to their medication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72325
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation, Reliability, Psychometric Validation, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Urdu Version of the Self‐Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS‐U) Among Hypertensive Patients in Lahore, Pakistan: A Validation Study

Muhammad Raashed, Shumaila Zofeen, Somia Bakhtiar Lone, Sunil Kripalani et al.
Health Science Reports
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Translation, Reliability, Psychometric Validation, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Urdu Version of the Self‐Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS‐U) Among Hypertensive Patients in Lahore, Pakistan: A Validation Study

Muhammad Raashed, Shumaila Zofeen, Somia Bakhtiar Lone, Sunil Kripalani, Mehwish Kiran, Shafqat Qamer, Shahzad Ahmad, Shazia Iqbal, Muhammad Arshed, Ahmad Umar, Muhammad Farooq Umer, Muhammad Yaqoob
article en

Abstract

Background: The Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale, also known as SEAMS, is a widely used self-reported measure of confidence in taking medications correctly. However, the scale has not been validated in different languages. Aim: The present study aims to translate and investigate the psychometric properties of the translated version of the scale SEAMS-Urdu (SEAMS-U) administered to hypertensive patients in Lahore, Pakistan, a South Asian country. Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional which enrolled hypertensive patients aged ≥ 18 years. The forward-backward method was employed for translation purposes. Content and face validity were assessed, and construct validity was evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), with convergent validity also assessed. Internal consistency measures such as Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability (over a 4-week interval) were also employed. Results: Of the 1012 participants, the majority of our respondents were male (67.4%) and aged 50 and above (45.5%). The SEAMS-U 13 items had good internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha: 0.878. In item analysis, Cronbach's alpha varied between 0.849 and 0.883, while the values for the two halves of the questionnaire were 0.838 and 0.789, indicating good reliability of the questionnaire. The test-retest reliability analysis was adequate (0.686), while the intra-class correlation (ICC) remained high at 0.814. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) makes a 2-factor model in rotated space that explained 68.162% of the total variation. Later, CFA confirmed the 2-factor model with goodness-of-fit measures indicating an acceptable model fit. Convergent validity was adequate, with the Cronbach's alpha reliability of the 9-item SEAMS-U 2-factor model of 0.886. Conclusion: The SEAMS-U is a valid and reliable measure of self-efficacy for antihypertensive medication in Pakistan. This simple tool can be used to assess the confidence of persons with hypertension outside of the tertiary hospital setting to adhere to their medication.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(5)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Punjab Institute of Cardiology (PK), Baqai Medical University (PK), University of Health Sciences Lahore (PK), King Faisal University (SA), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (PK), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), University of Buckingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.