Affective Responses of Healthcare Professionals and the General Public to Health Conditions Involving Physical Dysfunction: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey of Stroke, Femoral Neck Fracture, and Spinal Cord Injury

Background/Objectives: Attitudes toward health conditions involving physical dysfunction may differ between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and the general public. This study compared affective responses to stroke, femoral neck fracture (FNF), and spinal cord injury (SCI) across both groups within a unified framework. Methods: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of 400 members of the general public (stratified by age and gender) and 400 HCPs representing 18 professions. Affective responses were measured using scales assessing negative affect, interpersonal avoidance, and impressions (physical strength, mental resilience, and mental strength). A 2 × 3 mixed-model ANOVA (group × condition) and correlation analyses were conducted. Results: Negative affect showed a significant group × condition interaction (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.030). HCPs scored lower than the general public for stroke and FNF, with no significant difference for SCI. HCPs also reported lower interpersonal avoidance across all conditions. Impression scales showed no interaction; however, HCPs rated higher physical strength and mental strength, while mental resilience showed no group difference. Condition effects were significant, with a consistent hierarchy of SCI > stroke > FNF for both negative affect and interpersonal avoidance. Negative affect and interpersonal avoidance were moderately correlated in both groups. Among HCPs, FNF-related interpersonal avoidance negatively correlated with years of clinical experience. Conclusions: HCPs generally report less negative affect and interpersonal avoidance and hold more positive perceptions of patient capability than the general public. However, both groups share a negativity hierarchy across conditions, suggesting persistent perceptions associated with specific health labels.