“Having People to Rely on Makes All the Difference”: Supporting Providers of Abortion and Gender-Affirming care [ID 3924]

INTRODUCTION: Abortion and gender-affirming care promote bodily autonomy, are subject to societal stigmatization, and are targets of political interference. Providers of this care face unique challenges due to these factors. The objective of this study is to explore the challenges that abortion and gender-affirming providers face and to understand the factors that are supportive of their work. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semistructured focus groups and individual interviews with 15 physicians who provide abortion care, gender-affirming care, or both in the United States from December 2024 to February 2025. Recruitment was conducted using convenience and snowball sampling. Focus groups and interviews were conducted online, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analyzed using deductive and inductive coding and thematic analysis. This study was approved by the University at Buffalo IRB (ID: STUDY00008840). RESULTS: Fifteen providers participated (seven abortion providers, four gender-affirming care providers, and four who provide both). Participants identified as cis, trans, and nonbinary and represented every major region of the United States. Most participants were actively pursuing or had recently completed subspeciality training. Isolation and stigmatization emerged as major challenges. Of the supportive factors that emerged, professional networks, interprofessional collaboration, and relationships with providers of nonclinical services were identified as particularly valuable. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Strategies that promote professional networks and foster multidisciplinary collaboration may help overcome some of the unique challenges that providers of abortion and gender-affirming care face, given the highly stigmatized and politicized nature of this health care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006268.47
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Having People to Rely on Makes All the Difference”: Supporting Providers of Abortion and Gender-Affirming care [ID 3924]

Madison Clague, Elana Tal, Berkley Sawester, Zoe Arditi
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

“Having People to Rely on Makes All the Difference”: Supporting Providers of Abortion and Gender-Affirming care [ID 3924]

Madison Clague, Elana Tal, Berkley Sawester, Zoe Arditi
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abortion and gender-affirming care promote bodily autonomy, are subject to societal stigmatization, and are targets of political interference. Providers of this care face unique challenges due to these factors. The objective of this study is to explore the challenges that abortion and gender-affirming providers face and to understand the factors that are supportive of their work. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semistructured focus groups and individual interviews with 15 physicians who provide abortion care, gender-affirming care, or both in the United States from December 2024 to February 2025. Recruitment was conducted using convenience and snowball sampling. Focus groups and interviews were conducted online, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analyzed using deductive and inductive coding and thematic analysis. This study was approved by the University at Buffalo IRB (ID: STUDY00008840). RESULTS: Fifteen providers participated (seven abortion providers, four gender-affirming care providers, and four who provide both). Participants identified as cis, trans, and nonbinary and represented every major region of the United States. Most participants were actively pursuing or had recently completed subspeciality training. Isolation and stigmatization emerged as major challenges. Of the supportive factors that emerged, professional networks, interprofessional collaboration, and relationships with providers of nonclinical services were identified as particularly valuable. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Strategies that promote professional networks and foster multidisciplinary collaboration may help overcome some of the unique challenges that providers of abortion and gender-affirming care face, given the highly stigmatized and politicized nature of this health care.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 147(5S)
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Having People to Rely on Makes All the Difference”: Supporting Providers of Abortion and Gender-Affirming care [ID 3924] — Madison Clague, Elana Tal, et al. · Obstetrics and Gynecology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS