Establishing Reporting Requirements for Decision‐Makers: A Cross‐Sectional Study From a Public Dental Service in New South Wales, Australia

Objectives: Public dental organizations require effective and evidence-based support for clinical and business decision-making. A pilot business intelligence system has been proposed for a public dental service in New South Wales, Australia, to aid with this decision-making. To inform the design and development of this system, we aim to identify the key performance indicators and report features perceived to be the most valuable to the dental service decision-makers. Method: A self-administered survey employing best-worst scaling with balanced incomplete block designs was sent to all eligible decision-makers in a Local Health District public dental service in New South Wales, Australia. Participants ranked seven areas of information and five report features. Quantitative rankings were complemented with free-text comments. Results: Nine of the possible 12 participants (75%) completed the survey. The results reported "Patient demand" as the most important area of information for inclusion in the business intelligence system, with "patient demographics" ranked the lowest. For report features, the most important features were reported to be "readability" and "level of detail". All participants reported that they were expected to use computerized reports as part of their role, with four (44%) participants reporting accessing computerized reports more than 100 times in their previous 30 working days. Conclusion: The novel pilot study applies best-worst scaling for prioritizing key performance indicators among public dental decision-makers at a Local Health District within New South Wales and underscores the established role of computerized reports in decision-making processes. These findings will directly guide the design and implementation of a pilot business intelligence reporting system, aiming to enhance data accessibility and accelerate evidence-based decisions within a public dental service to ultimately enhance service efficiency. Future evaluation will be needed to assess the adoption rates of this system and its impact on operational efficiency and patient care outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72465
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing Reporting Requirements for Decision‐Makers: A Cross‐Sectional Study From a Public Dental Service in New South Wales, Australia

Michelle Irving, Jared S. Walters, G. C. Livingston, Janet Wallace et al.
Health Science Reports
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Establishing Reporting Requirements for Decision‐Makers: A Cross‐Sectional Study From a Public Dental Service in New South Wales, Australia

Michelle Irving, Jared S. Walters, G. C. Livingston, Janet Wallace, Dileep Sharma
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Public dental organizations require effective and evidence-based support for clinical and business decision-making. A pilot business intelligence system has been proposed for a public dental service in New South Wales, Australia, to aid with this decision-making. To inform the design and development of this system, we aim to identify the key performance indicators and report features perceived to be the most valuable to the dental service decision-makers. Method: A self-administered survey employing best-worst scaling with balanced incomplete block designs was sent to all eligible decision-makers in a Local Health District public dental service in New South Wales, Australia. Participants ranked seven areas of information and five report features. Quantitative rankings were complemented with free-text comments. Results: Nine of the possible 12 participants (75%) completed the survey. The results reported "Patient demand" as the most important area of information for inclusion in the business intelligence system, with "patient demographics" ranked the lowest. For report features, the most important features were reported to be "readability" and "level of detail". All participants reported that they were expected to use computerized reports as part of their role, with four (44%) participants reporting accessing computerized reports more than 100 times in their previous 30 working days. Conclusion: The novel pilot study applies best-worst scaling for prioritizing key performance indicators among public dental decision-makers at a Local Health District within New South Wales and underscores the established role of computerized reports in decision-making processes. These findings will directly guide the design and implementation of a pilot business intelligence reporting system, aiming to enhance data accessibility and accelerate evidence-based decisions within a public dental service to ultimately enhance service efficiency. Future evaluation will be needed to assess the adoption rates of this system and its impact on operational efficiency and patient care outcomes.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(5)
The University of Sydney (AU), Hunter Water (AU), Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), SEGi University (MY)
Hunter New England Local Health District, Australian Government
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.