Combating Tokenism: Highlighting the Role of Power in Making Inclusion Meaningful

Abstract This article uses an organizational perspective to highlight the role of power in making inclusion meaningful at a non-denominational evangelical congregation. Using qualitative data, I analyze non-religious organizational processes that affect power relations among members in organizational settings. I identify two complementary strategies for coordinating collective action that make inclusion meaningful in practice. The first strategy Politicizes Inclusivity by instituting recurrent public deliberations on inclusivity and diversity. The second strategy uses a set of Inclusive Power Arrangements that empower the voices of marginalized members in the everyday workings of the church. Finally, I show how the success of these strategies in producing racial and socioeconomic diversity created such a strong feeling of trust that members readopted them even after realizing that LGBT inclusion involved different challenges. Findings extend fundamental theoretical assertions about studying inclusivity in religious organizations and address issues relevant to the persistent problem of tokenism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Sociology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-025-09628-7
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combating Tokenism: Highlighting the Role of Power in Making Inclusion Meaningful

Arnab Chakraborty
Qualitative Sociology
Religion, Society, and Development
article

Combating Tokenism: Highlighting the Role of Power in Making Inclusion Meaningful

Arnab Chakraborty
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article uses an organizational perspective to highlight the role of power in making inclusion meaningful at a non-denominational evangelical congregation. Using qualitative data, I analyze non-religious organizational processes that affect power relations among members in organizational settings. I identify two complementary strategies for coordinating collective action that make inclusion meaningful in practice. The first strategy Politicizes Inclusivity by instituting recurrent public deliberations on inclusivity and diversity. The second strategy uses a set of Inclusive Power Arrangements that empower the voices of marginalized members in the everyday workings of the church. Finally, I show how the success of these strategies in producing racial and socioeconomic diversity created such a strong feeling of trust that members readopted them even after realizing that LGBT inclusion involved different challenges. Findings extend fundamental theoretical assertions about studying inclusivity in religious organizations and address issues relevant to the persistent problem of tokenism.

Qualitative Sociology
University of Southern California
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Combating Tokenism: Highlighting the Role of Power in Making Inclusion Meaningful — Arnab Chakraborty · Qualitative Sociology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS