Extension of Fusion to the Cervical Spine Versus Upper Thoracic Spine for the Management of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis of Thoracolumbar Fusion

Study Design: Retrospective review of multicenter, prospective cervical deformity database. Objective: To compare outcomes of extension of fusion to the cervical spine versus the upper thoracic (UT) spine. Summary of Background Data: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) management after thoracolumbar fusion requires extension of fusion to the proximal spinal segments. Unlike extensions to the less mobile thoracic segments, crossing the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) involves more mobile cervical segments and creates different biomechanical influences and clinical outcomes. No study has compared the outcomes of extending fusion to the cervical versus the UT spine. Methods: Patients with thoracic PJK who underwent revision with extension of fusion to either the cervical or UT (T1 or T2) spine were identified in a multicenter, prospective cervical deformity database. Patients with cervical upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) were subdivided into lower cervical (LC; C4–7) and upper cervical (UC; and occiput–C3) groups. Baseline demographics, surgical variables, radiographic outcomes, 2-year health-related quality-of-life scores, complications, and revision rates were analyzed. Results: Fifty-one patients (mean age: 60.4±12.9 y; 91% female) with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Twelve had extension to the UT, 20 to the LC, and 19 to the UC spine. Demographic data, Charlson Comorbidity Index, follow-up duration, surgical parameters, radiographic measurements, recurrent PJK and reoperation rates, and 2-year patient-reported outcome scores were similar across groups. The instrumentation failure rate was higher in the LC (25%) than in the UT (0%) and UC (8%) groups ( P =0.03). Conclusions: Stopping fusion at T1 or T2 did not result in greater complication or reoperation rates than extending to the cervical spine. The instrumentation-related complication rate was higher for extension to the LC than to the UC or UT spine. Crossing the CTJ should be individualized, but may not prevent additional proximal junctional-level problems in the management of thoracolumbar fusion PJK. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000002060
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extension of Fusion to the Cervical Spine Versus Upper Thoracic Spine for the Management of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis of Thoracolumbar Fusion

Breton Line, Darryl Lau, Richard A. Hostin, Shay Bess et al.
Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine Publication
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Extension of Fusion to the Cervical Spine Versus Upper Thoracic Spine for the Management of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis of Thoracolumbar Fusion

Breton Line, Darryl Lau, Richard A. Hostin, Shay Bess, Yesha Parekh, Maxwell Sahhar, Robert K. Eastlack, Ahmed Sulieman, Thomas J. Buell, International Spine Study Group, Sang Hun Lee, Peter G. Passias, Gregory M. Mundis, Khaled M. Kebaish, Themistocles S. Protopsaltis, Christopher P. Ames, Munish C. Gupta, Renaud Lafage, Jeffrey L. Gum, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Justin S. Smith, Han Jo Kim, Virginie Lafage
article en

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective review of multicenter, prospective cervical deformity database. Objective: To compare outcomes of extension of fusion to the cervical spine versus the upper thoracic (UT) spine. Summary of Background Data: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) management after thoracolumbar fusion requires extension of fusion to the proximal spinal segments. Unlike extensions to the less mobile thoracic segments, crossing the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) involves more mobile cervical segments and creates different biomechanical influences and clinical outcomes. No study has compared the outcomes of extending fusion to the cervical versus the UT spine. Methods: Patients with thoracic PJK who underwent revision with extension of fusion to either the cervical or UT (T1 or T2) spine were identified in a multicenter, prospective cervical deformity database. Patients with cervical upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) were subdivided into lower cervical (LC; C4–7) and upper cervical (UC; and occiput–C3) groups. Baseline demographics, surgical variables, radiographic outcomes, 2-year health-related quality-of-life scores, complications, and revision rates were analyzed. Results: Fifty-one patients (mean age: 60.4±12.9 y; 91% female) with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Twelve had extension to the UT, 20 to the LC, and 19 to the UC spine. Demographic data, Charlson Comorbidity Index, follow-up duration, surgical parameters, radiographic measurements, recurrent PJK and reoperation rates, and 2-year patient-reported outcome scores were similar across groups. The instrumentation failure rate was higher in the LC (25%) than in the UT (0%) and UC (8%) groups ( P =0.03). Conclusions: Stopping fusion at T1 or T2 did not result in greater complication or reoperation rates than extending to the cervical spine. The instrumentation-related complication rate was higher for extension to the LC than to the UC or UT spine. Crossing the CTJ should be individualized, but may not prevent additional proximal junctional-level problems in the management of thoracolumbar fusion PJK. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine PublicationVol. 39(4)
Hospital for Special Surgery (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Brown University (US), University of Virginia Health System (US), Lenox Hill Hospital (US), NYU Langone Health (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Southwest Scoliosis Institute (US), San Diego Spine Institute (US), Scripps Clinic (US), International Breast Cancer Study Group (CH), Neurological Surgery (US), Sensory Processing Disorder Foundation (US), New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.