Classism, Perceived Stress, and Mental Health Symptoms: Cross-Sectional Evidence from a Census-Matched U.S. Sample

Background/Objectives: Classism, or discrimination based on social class, is associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. However, limited research has examined the psychological processes that may help explain these associations. The present study tested whether perceived stress statistically mediated the associations between experienced and anticipated classism and mental health symptoms. Methods: A U.S. census-matched sample on age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, and census region (n = 1993) was analyzed. Missing data were addressed using Bayesian multiple imputation, and mediation models estimated total, direct, and indirect effects. Results: Results indicated that perceived stress statistically accounted for the associations between both experienced and anticipated classism and higher depression and anxiety symptoms, even after adjusting for income and education. In exploratory analyses, individuals living at or below the federal poverty line reported a higher likelihood of experiencing classism, and perceived stress significantly mediated the association between experienced classism and mental health symptoms within this population. Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary evidence that perceived stress is a statistical mediator of the association between classism and mental health symptoms. Future prospective and experimental work is required to establish potential causal relationships between the constructs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091205
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classism, Perceived Stress, and Mental Health Symptoms: Cross-Sectional Evidence from a Census-Matched U.S. Sample

M Chen, A. Janet Tomiyama, Jeffrey M. Hunger, D.G. Figueroa et al.
Healthcare
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Classism, Perceived Stress, and Mental Health Symptoms: Cross-Sectional Evidence from a Census-Matched U.S. Sample

M Chen, A. Janet Tomiyama, Jeffrey M. Hunger, D.G. Figueroa, Matthew Phillipi, Jordan E. Parker
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Classism, or discrimination based on social class, is associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms. However, limited research has examined the psychological processes that may help explain these associations. The present study tested whether perceived stress statistically mediated the associations between experienced and anticipated classism and mental health symptoms. Methods: A U.S. census-matched sample on age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, and census region (n = 1993) was analyzed. Missing data were addressed using Bayesian multiple imputation, and mediation models estimated total, direct, and indirect effects. Results: Results indicated that perceived stress statistically accounted for the associations between both experienced and anticipated classism and higher depression and anxiety symptoms, even after adjusting for income and education. In exploratory analyses, individuals living at or below the federal poverty line reported a higher likelihood of experiencing classism, and perceived stress significantly mediated the association between experienced classism and mental health symptoms within this population. Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary evidence that perceived stress is a statistical mediator of the association between classism and mental health symptoms. Future prospective and experimental work is required to establish potential causal relationships between the constructs.

HealthcareVol. 14(9)
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.