Firm Size and Dynamics in Less-Developed Economies

A growing body of evidence shows that businesses in developing economies are systematically smaller, grow more slowly, and exhibit lower turnover than those in advanced economies. These patterns are driven in part by nonemployer and micro businesses, which absorb the bulk of workers in low-income settings. This article reviews macro development research that extends the standard Lucas–Hopenhayn framework to account for the smaller size and more limited dynamism of businesses in poorer economies. Distortions that disproportionately affect high-productivity firms, together with lagging technologies, emerge as central explanatory forces, though they often fall short of replicating the empirical size-to-GDP elasticity. Incorporating nonemployers appears to improve the model's ability to match several dimensions of the data. Identifying actionable sources of distortions and technology gaps and combining firm-level data with individual-level sources are highlighted as additional promising avenues to improve the profession's understanding of sources of the development problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Economics
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081525-072902
Primary Topic
Firm Innovation and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Firm Size and Dynamics in Less-Developed Economies

Marcela Eslava
Annual Review of Economics
Firm Innovation and Growth
article

Firm Size and Dynamics in Less-Developed Economies

Marcela Eslava
article en

Abstract

A growing body of evidence shows that businesses in developing economies are systematically smaller, grow more slowly, and exhibit lower turnover than those in advanced economies. These patterns are driven in part by nonemployer and micro businesses, which absorb the bulk of workers in low-income settings. This article reviews macro development research that extends the standard Lucas–Hopenhayn framework to account for the smaller size and more limited dynamism of businesses in poorer economies. Distortions that disproportionately affect high-productivity firms, together with lagging technologies, emerge as central explanatory forces, though they often fall short of replicating the empirical size-to-GDP elasticity. Incorporating nonemployers appears to improve the model's ability to match several dimensions of the data. Identifying actionable sources of distortions and technology gaps and combining firm-level data with individual-level sources are highlighted as additional promising avenues to improve the profession's understanding of sources of the development problem.

Annual Review of Economics
Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Firm Innovation and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Firm Size and Dynamics in Less-Developed Economies — Marcela Eslava · Annual Review of Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS