Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Discectomy: Morphine vs. Dexamethasone-Soaked Epidural Gelfoam: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract This study compared the analgesic efficacy of gelfoam-soaked epidural morphine with gelfoam-soaked epidural dexamethasone following lumbar discectomies as their clinical comparison is lacking. Sixty patients undergoing single-level lumbar discectomy surgeries were randomized either in group M (gelfoam-soaked epidural morphine, 3 mg) or in group D (gelfoam-soaked epidural dexamethasone, 8 mg) placed over the duramater before the closure. The primary objective was to compare the mean time to first rescue analgesia for 24 postoperative hours. The secondary objectives were pain intensity, total rescue analgesic requirement, and to look for any adverse event related to study drugs. The primary outcome was analyzed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test as well as a Cox proportional hazards model. The categorical outcome of complete response was compared using a chi-squared test. The other numerical outcomes were compared using a linear mixed effects model accounting for repeated measures and the categorical repeated measure outcome was evaluated using a binomial generalized estimating equations model. The mean time to first analgesic (hours) in both the groups (M vs. D, 26 [12] vs. 19 [6], mean difference = 7 [95% confidence interval [CI], −8.2, 22, p = 0.3, unpaired t-test) was not significant. The pain scores showed a tendency toward low pain scores at 24 hours in the morphine group. The sedation scores and number needing rescue analgesia did not differ between groups. Pain scores and the number needing rescue analgesia decreased significantly in both groups over time. There was a difference in terms of complete response between the groups (M vs. D, 83% vs. 57%, difference of 27% [95% CI of 1.1%, 52%], p = 0.02, chi-square test). Gelfoam-soaked epidural morphine versus dexamethasone demonstrated no difference in mean time to first rescue analgesic following lumbar discectomy surgeries but gelfoam-soaked epidural morphine reduced the requirement of rescue analgesia in the first 24 postoperative hours compared with gelfoam-soaked epidural dexamethasone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1820108
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Discectomy: Morphine vs. Dexamethasone-Soaked Epidural Gelfoam: A Randomized Controlled Trial

P K Bhatia, Narender Kaloria, Priyanka Sethi, Jaskaran Singh Gosal et al.
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Discectomy: Morphine vs. Dexamethasone-Soaked Epidural Gelfoam: A Randomized Controlled Trial

P K Bhatia, Narender Kaloria, Priyanka Sethi, Jaskaran Singh Gosal, Ankur Sharma, Mayank Garg, Shoban Babu Vartya, Ashwini Reddy, Venkata Ganesh, Manbir Kaur
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study compared the analgesic efficacy of gelfoam-soaked epidural morphine with gelfoam-soaked epidural dexamethasone following lumbar discectomies as their clinical comparison is lacking. Sixty patients undergoing single-level lumbar discectomy surgeries were randomized either in group M (gelfoam-soaked epidural morphine, 3 mg) or in group D (gelfoam-soaked epidural dexamethasone, 8 mg) placed over the duramater before the closure. The primary objective was to compare the mean time to first rescue analgesia for 24 postoperative hours. The secondary objectives were pain intensity, total rescue analgesic requirement, and to look for any adverse event related to study drugs. The primary outcome was analyzed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test as well as a Cox proportional hazards model. The categorical outcome of complete response was compared using a chi-squared test. The other numerical outcomes were compared using a linear mixed effects model accounting for repeated measures and the categorical repeated measure outcome was evaluated using a binomial generalized estimating equations model. The mean time to first analgesic (hours) in both the groups (M vs. D, 26 [12] vs. 19 [6], mean difference = 7 [95% confidence interval [CI], −8.2, 22, p = 0.3, unpaired t-test) was not significant. The pain scores showed a tendency toward low pain scores at 24 hours in the morphine group. The sedation scores and number needing rescue analgesia did not differ between groups. Pain scores and the number needing rescue analgesia decreased significantly in both groups over time. There was a difference in terms of complete response between the groups (M vs. D, 83% vs. 57%, difference of 27% [95% CI of 1.1%, 52%], p = 0.02, chi-square test). Gelfoam-soaked epidural morphine versus dexamethasone demonstrated no difference in mean time to first rescue analgesic following lumbar discectomy surgeries but gelfoam-soaked epidural morphine reduced the requirement of rescue analgesia in the first 24 postoperative hours compared with gelfoam-soaked epidural dexamethasone.

Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.