Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study Applying EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and LARS Score at 1–6 Months Postoperatively

Background/Objectives: Quality of life (QoL) and functional recovery are essential outcomes in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. In addition to oncological results, bowel dysfunction and stoma-related issues may significantly affect postoperative well-being. We aimed to evaluate QoL changes at 1 and 6 months postoperatively and functional outcomes in rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgical treatment, sphincter-preserving surgeries (SPS) or abdominoperineal resection (APR). Owing to its impact on QoL, several functions were assessed using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score. Methods: This retrospective observational study consisted of 99 patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery, of which 38 patients had colostomy, and 61 no colostomy. To assess patient-reported outcomes related to QoL, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, QLQ-CR29 questionnaire, and LARS instrument were sent to the patients at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Changes over time were analyzed using paired statistical tests, and subgroup analyses were performed according to colostomy status and surgical approach. Results: Significant improvements were observed in the global health status and all major functional domains between 1 and 6 months postoperatively. The global health status increased from 74.9% to 86.5% (p < 0.001). Symptom burden decreased significantly, particularly for fatigue (−18.31), pain (−14.48), diarrhea (−12.46), and insomnia (−11.45), representing clinically meaningful improvements. Patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection or resection with colostomy had lower QoL scores at 1 month but showed substantial improvement at 6 months, becoming comparable to those who underwent SPS. LARS outcomes demonstrated progressive functional recovery, with the proportion of patients without LARS increasing from 39 to 46, while major LARS decreased from 7 to 3 patients. However, approximately 40% of patients in the SPS group continued to report moderate-to-severe LARS symptoms. Conclusions: In this study, QoL and bowel function improved significantly during the first 6 months after colorectal cancer surgery. Although most patients demonstrated recovery, persistent bowel dysfunction and stoma-related challenges remain important issues. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive postoperative care and routine assessment of both QoL and functional outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091203
Primary Topic
Stoma care and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study Applying EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and LARS Score at 1–6 Months Postoperatively

N Iordache, Mircea Liţescu, Grigorean, Raul Mihailov et al.
Healthcare
Stoma care and complications
article

Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study Applying EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and LARS Score at 1–6 Months Postoperatively

N Iordache, Mircea Liţescu, Grigorean, Raul Mihailov, Floris Cristian Stanculea, Valerii Luțenco, Octav Ginghina, Razvan A. Stoica, Claudiu O. Ungureanu
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Quality of life (QoL) and functional recovery are essential outcomes in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. In addition to oncological results, bowel dysfunction and stoma-related issues may significantly affect postoperative well-being. We aimed to evaluate QoL changes at 1 and 6 months postoperatively and functional outcomes in rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgical treatment, sphincter-preserving surgeries (SPS) or abdominoperineal resection (APR). Owing to its impact on QoL, several functions were assessed using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score. Methods: This retrospective observational study consisted of 99 patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery, of which 38 patients had colostomy, and 61 no colostomy. To assess patient-reported outcomes related to QoL, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, QLQ-CR29 questionnaire, and LARS instrument were sent to the patients at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Changes over time were analyzed using paired statistical tests, and subgroup analyses were performed according to colostomy status and surgical approach. Results: Significant improvements were observed in the global health status and all major functional domains between 1 and 6 months postoperatively. The global health status increased from 74.9% to 86.5% (p < 0.001). Symptom burden decreased significantly, particularly for fatigue (−18.31), pain (−14.48), diarrhea (−12.46), and insomnia (−11.45), representing clinically meaningful improvements. Patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection or resection with colostomy had lower QoL scores at 1 month but showed substantial improvement at 6 months, becoming comparable to those who underwent SPS. LARS outcomes demonstrated progressive functional recovery, with the proportion of patients without LARS increasing from 39 to 46, while major LARS decreased from 7 to 3 patients. However, approximately 40% of patients in the SPS group continued to report moderate-to-severe LARS symptoms. Conclusions: In this study, QoL and bowel function improved significantly during the first 6 months after colorectal cancer surgery. Although most patients demonstrated recovery, persistent bowel dysfunction and stoma-related challenges remain important issues. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive postoperative care and routine assessment of both QoL and functional outcomes.

HealthcareVol. 14(9)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO), Institutul Oncologic Bucuresti (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Stoma care and complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.