Comparative Evaluation of ecPoint and EMOS for CMA-GEPS Precipitation Forecast over Eastern China
Post-processing of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models constitutes a pivotal link in enhancing forecast performance. Despite their recognition as cutting-edge point-based post-processing techniques, systematic comparative evaluations of ecPoint (ECWMF for point forecasts) and Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS)—particularly assessments of their applicability outside Europe and to Chinese ensemble forecasting systems—remain sparse. In this study, we evaluate two advanced post-processing techniques—EMOS and the ecPoint—for calibrating ensemble precipitation forecasts. A comprehensive assessment of the performance of these ensemble post-processing methods is conducted using the CMA-GEPS (China Meteorological Administration’s Global Ensemble Forecasting System forecast over eastern China. The results demonstrate that both methods significantly mitigate systematic biases and improve the reliability and dispersion of ensemble forecasts. Notably, improvement in forecast accuracy is observed even under convective weather conditions and early-warning capability of extreme precipitation events is improved. Overall, while both methods show comparable performance, they exhibit distinct behaviours across different regions. The ecPoint method slightly outperforms EMOS in terms of Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS) and provides improved resolution and early-warning capabilities at various precipitation thresholds.
Authors
- Pu Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8083-8262)
- Jialing Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-1151)
- Sonum Stejik
- Phuntsok Tsewang
Institutions
- Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Shaanxi Provincial Meteorological Bureau (CN)
- Jiangsu Provincial Meteorological Bureau (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Atmosphere
- Published
- 2026-04-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17050458
- Primary Topic
- Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00