Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for primary malignant bone tumors

Background Primary malignant bone tumors are aggressive neoplasms that frequently affect adolescents and young adults. Limb-sparing surgery (LSS) has become the preferred surgical approach when oncologically feasible; however, survival outcomes vary considerably, and robust prognostic indicators remain essential for risk stratification and follow-up planning. Aim To evaluate clinical, laboratory, surgical, and histopathological factors associated with survival and functional outcomes in patients with primary malignant bone tumors treated with limb-sparing surgery. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients with histologically confirmed primary malignant bone tumors who underwent LSS at a tertiary orthopedic oncology center. All patients were free of distant metastasis at baseline. Clinical, imaging, laboratory, surgical, and pathological variables were analyzed. Tumor necrosis was assessed only in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression was performed with exclusion of post-baseline events from baseline models to avoid time-dependent bias. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). The median follow-up duration was 36 months (IQR: 24–60 months). Results During follow-up, 27 deaths (24.55%), 17 local recurrences (15.45%), and 28 distant metastatic events (25.45%) were recorded. The overall survival rate at last follow-up was 75.45%, and the disease-free survival rate beyond two years was 67.27%. Favorable survival was significantly associated with tumor necrosis >90%, wide surgical margins, and lower serum LDH levels. In multivariable analysis, tumor necrosis ≤90% (HR 2.84), non-wide surgical margins (HR 2.47), elevated LDH (HR 2.12), and high Ki-67 index (HR 2.28) were independently associated with reduced overall survival. Good functional outcomes (MSTS ≥24) were achieved in 62.73% of patients, and 65.45% attained TESS scores >70. Conclusion Limb-sparing surgery can provide satisfactory oncologic and functional outcomes in selected patients with primary malignant bone tumors. Survival outcomes were independently associated with tumor response to chemotherapy, surgical margin status, and tumor biology. Given the heterogeneity of bone sarcoma subtypes, these findings should be interpreted with caution and regarded as hypothesis-generating, supporting individualized multidisciplinary management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1680456
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for primary malignant bone tumors

Chunan Zhong, Jijun Liu, Songtao Gao, Yuzhe Zhang et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for primary malignant bone tumors

Chunan Zhong, Jijun Liu, Songtao Gao, Yuzhe Zhang, Lin Wang
article en

Abstract

Background Primary malignant bone tumors are aggressive neoplasms that frequently affect adolescents and young adults. Limb-sparing surgery (LSS) has become the preferred surgical approach when oncologically feasible; however, survival outcomes vary considerably, and robust prognostic indicators remain essential for risk stratification and follow-up planning. Aim To evaluate clinical, laboratory, surgical, and histopathological factors associated with survival and functional outcomes in patients with primary malignant bone tumors treated with limb-sparing surgery. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients with histologically confirmed primary malignant bone tumors who underwent LSS at a tertiary orthopedic oncology center. All patients were free of distant metastasis at baseline. Clinical, imaging, laboratory, surgical, and pathological variables were analyzed. Tumor necrosis was assessed only in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression was performed with exclusion of post-baseline events from baseline models to avoid time-dependent bias. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). The median follow-up duration was 36 months (IQR: 24–60 months). Results During follow-up, 27 deaths (24.55%), 17 local recurrences (15.45%), and 28 distant metastatic events (25.45%) were recorded. The overall survival rate at last follow-up was 75.45%, and the disease-free survival rate beyond two years was 67.27%. Favorable survival was significantly associated with tumor necrosis >90%, wide surgical margins, and lower serum LDH levels. In multivariable analysis, tumor necrosis ≤90% (HR 2.84), non-wide surgical margins (HR 2.47), elevated LDH (HR 2.12), and high Ki-67 index (HR 2.28) were independently associated with reduced overall survival. Good functional outcomes (MSTS ≥24) were achieved in 62.73% of patients, and 65.45% attained TESS scores >70. Conclusion Limb-sparing surgery can provide satisfactory oncologic and functional outcomes in selected patients with primary malignant bone tumors. Survival outcomes were independently associated with tumor response to chemotherapy, surgical margin status, and tumor biology. Given the heterogeneity of bone sarcoma subtypes, these findings should be interpreted with caution and regarded as hypothesis-generating, supporting individualized multidisciplinary management strategies.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Henan Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.