Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Occupational Resilience Measure (ORM 1.0)

Background: The Occupational Resilience Measure (ORM 1.0) is a 20-item, multidimensional self-report tool for measuring occupational resilience, a construct defined as an individual's ability to persist in performing occupations despite barriers. Objective: This study evaluated test-retest reliability and internal consistency and explored the extent to which ORM 1.0 is a reliable measure across a diverse range of activity types. Methods: Ninety-four participants completed the test and retest measurements within a 2- to 3-week period. A total of 202 activities were included in the analysis, grouped into leisure (LE) [94], productivity (PD) [35], and self-care (SC) [73]. Findings: The estimates of test-retest reliability (95% confidence interval [CI]) for SC, LE, and PD were 0.863 (0.794,0.91), 0.860 (0.793,0.907), and 0.876 (0.771,0.935), respectively, indicating good reliability across the two time points for each of the three categories. The Cronbach's alphas at time point 1 for SC, LE, and PD were 0.744 (0.666, 0.808), 0.711 (0.63, 0.778), and 0.694 (0.517, 0.818), respectively, suggesting acceptable to good internal consistency. Similarly, the estimates of Cronbach's alpha at time point 2 for the three occupational categories were: 0.79 (0.725, 0.842), 0.766 (0.7, 0.82), and 0.775 (0.645, 0.866), respectively, indicating good internal consistency. Conclusion: The findings suggest that ORM 1.0 has test-retest reliability and internal consistency across leisure, productivity, and self-care occupations. The outcomes support the use of ORM 1.0 in clinical practice and research, although further research could strengthen its psychometric properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Human Occupation & Wellbeing Journal
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18552/25fgfk39
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Occupational Resilience Measure (ORM 1.0)

Bernard Muriithi, Kara Gore, Milan Bimali
The Human Occupation & Wellbeing Journal
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Occupational Resilience Measure (ORM 1.0)

Bernard Muriithi, Kara Gore, Milan Bimali
article en

Abstract

Background: The Occupational Resilience Measure (ORM 1.0) is a 20-item, multidimensional self-report tool for measuring occupational resilience, a construct defined as an individual's ability to persist in performing occupations despite barriers. Objective: This study evaluated test-retest reliability and internal consistency and explored the extent to which ORM 1.0 is a reliable measure across a diverse range of activity types. Methods: Ninety-four participants completed the test and retest measurements within a 2- to 3-week period. A total of 202 activities were included in the analysis, grouped into leisure (LE) [94], productivity (PD) [35], and self-care (SC) [73]. Findings: The estimates of test-retest reliability (95% confidence interval [CI]) for SC, LE, and PD were 0.863 (0.794,0.91), 0.860 (0.793,0.907), and 0.876 (0.771,0.935), respectively, indicating good reliability across the two time points for each of the three categories. The Cronbach's alphas at time point 1 for SC, LE, and PD were 0.744 (0.666, 0.808), 0.711 (0.63, 0.778), and 0.694 (0.517, 0.818), respectively, suggesting acceptable to good internal consistency. Similarly, the estimates of Cronbach's alpha at time point 2 for the three occupational categories were: 0.79 (0.725, 0.842), 0.766 (0.7, 0.82), and 0.775 (0.645, 0.866), respectively, indicating good internal consistency. Conclusion: The findings suggest that ORM 1.0 has test-retest reliability and internal consistency across leisure, productivity, and self-care occupations. The outcomes support the use of ORM 1.0 in clinical practice and research, although further research could strengthen its psychometric properties.

The Human Occupation & Wellbeing JournalVol. 2(1)
Binghamton University (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Occupational Resilience Measure (ORM 1.0) — Bernard Muriithi, Kara Gore, et al. · The Human Occupation & Wellbeing Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS