Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for migraine

Background Migraine is a prevalent neurological condition, affecting approximately 14% of the population, and is a leading cause of disability. Conventional treatments may have limited efficacy and tolerability limitations in clinical practice. Rimegepant is approved for the dual indications of managing acute migraine episodes and preventing migraine attacks. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rimegepant in migraine treatment. Method A systematic search of public databases from their inception until February 2025 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials for evaluating the efficacy of rimegepant in migraine treatment. The overall estimate was derived using the 95% confidence interval (CI) and risk ratio (RR) in a random-effects model. GRADEprofiler was employed to assess the quality of evidence. The Cochrane Collaboration was utilized to evaluate the risk of bias. Results Our investigation reviewed 5 studies, which included 2,715 individuals treated with rimegepant and 2,850 control participants. Patients treated with rimegepant had statistically significant pain relief (RR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.27–1.41; p < 0.05; I 2 = 0%) and freedom from Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) 2 h after treatment (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.28–1.49; p < 0.05; I 2 = 0%). However, the initial therapeutic success with rimegepant does not correlate with a sustained lack of pain relapse from 2 h to 48 h (RR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.99–1.37; p > 0.05; I 2 = 0%). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events observed between the treatment group and the control group (RR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.97–1.28; p > 0.05; I 2 = 0%). Conclusion Our findings suggest that rimegepant may be effective and generally well tolerated for acute migraine treatment. However, the drug did not demonstrate statistical significance for preventing pain relapse within 2–48 h following administration. Given the limitations in the quality and quantity of the included trials, the findings should be confirmed by multicenter, large-sample, randomized controlled trials. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251180156 , identifier: CRD420251180156.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1828779
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for migraine

Tong An, Zhixiang Liu, Wenbo Shi, Xiwen Duan et al.
Frontiers in Neurology
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for migraine

Tong An, Zhixiang Liu, Wenbo Shi, Xiwen Duan, Jiamei Liu, Jingqi Chuang, Yixuan Liu
article en

Abstract

Background Migraine is a prevalent neurological condition, affecting approximately 14% of the population, and is a leading cause of disability. Conventional treatments may have limited efficacy and tolerability limitations in clinical practice. Rimegepant is approved for the dual indications of managing acute migraine episodes and preventing migraine attacks. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rimegepant in migraine treatment. Method A systematic search of public databases from their inception until February 2025 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials for evaluating the efficacy of rimegepant in migraine treatment. The overall estimate was derived using the 95% confidence interval (CI) and risk ratio (RR) in a random-effects model. GRADEprofiler was employed to assess the quality of evidence. The Cochrane Collaboration was utilized to evaluate the risk of bias. Results Our investigation reviewed 5 studies, which included 2,715 individuals treated with rimegepant and 2,850 control participants. Patients treated with rimegepant had statistically significant pain relief (RR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.27–1.41; p < 0.05; I 2 = 0%) and freedom from Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) 2 h after treatment (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.28–1.49; p < 0.05; I 2 = 0%). However, the initial therapeutic success with rimegepant does not correlate with a sustained lack of pain relapse from 2 h to 48 h (RR = 1.16; 95% CI 0.99–1.37; p > 0.05; I 2 = 0%). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events observed between the treatment group and the control group (RR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.97–1.28; p > 0.05; I 2 = 0%). Conclusion Our findings suggest that rimegepant may be effective and generally well tolerated for acute migraine treatment. However, the drug did not demonstrate statistical significance for preventing pain relapse within 2–48 h following administration. Given the limitations in the quality and quantity of the included trials, the findings should be confirmed by multicenter, large-sample, randomized controlled trials. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251180156 , identifier: CRD420251180156.

Frontiers in NeurologyVol. 17
Shenyang Agricultural University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.