Revisiting <i>Manufacturing Consent</i> with Paul Thompson

Few texts have done more to shape how sociologists and social theorists think about workplace politics, labour agency, the everyday production of cooperation and even the sociology of work than Michael Burawoy’s Manufacturing Consent . As a result, discussing it poses a two-fold challenge – of scope and of depth. The first requires a profound understanding of the theoretical foundation of industrial sociology on which Burawoy built. The second, in-depth expertise of the organisation-level issues Burawoy puts forward. Paul Thompson, Emeritus Professor of Employment Studies at the University of Stirling, is a scholar equal to this challenge. Paul’s influential work has been central to shaping labour process analysis and debates, which Manufacturing Consent opened. Having extensively engaged with Burawoy’s work, Paul is uniquely placed to comment on the book’s legacy, over 40 years on. In the conversation which follows he reflects on how Burawoy is being taken up today, how Manufacturing Consent and its successor, The Politics of Production , changed the discipline, which of its insights have endured, and what still requires reflection and critical conversation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Sociological Review
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261261425459
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Manufacturing Consent with Paul Thompson

Constantine Manolchev, Ryan Nolan
The Sociological Review
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Revisiting Manufacturing Consent with Paul Thompson

Constantine Manolchev, Ryan Nolan
article en

Abstract

Few texts have done more to shape how sociologists and social theorists think about workplace politics, labour agency, the everyday production of cooperation and even the sociology of work than Michael Burawoy’s Manufacturing Consent . As a result, discussing it poses a two-fold challenge – of scope and of depth. The first requires a profound understanding of the theoretical foundation of industrial sociology on which Burawoy built. The second, in-depth expertise of the organisation-level issues Burawoy puts forward. Paul Thompson, Emeritus Professor of Employment Studies at the University of Stirling, is a scholar equal to this challenge. Paul’s influential work has been central to shaping labour process analysis and debates, which Manufacturing Consent opened. Having extensively engaged with Burawoy’s work, Paul is uniquely placed to comment on the book’s legacy, over 40 years on. In the conversation which follows he reflects on how Burawoy is being taken up today, how Manufacturing Consent and its successor, The Politics of Production , changed the discipline, which of its insights have endured, and what still requires reflection and critical conversation.

The Sociological ReviewVol. 74(3)
University of Exeter (GB), University of Salford (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting <i>Manufacturing Consent</i> with Paul Thompson — Constantine Manolchev, Ryan Nolan · The Sociological Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS