Preferred Colleague Dataset: A Human-Annotated Dataset of Perceived Colleague Preference

Recruitment is a time-consuming process, and AI systems are increasingly being used to support the decision-making process. However, machine learning models used in such systems can inherit bias if the underlying training data reflects biased human preferences. It is essential to analyze and quantify these biases in order to develop fairer AI systems. To address this issue, we collected human judgments of colleague preference for 2200 face images. The face image set includes images of different ethnicities and genders, as well as both real and synthetically generated faces. The images were annotated by humans from diverse backgrounds in terms of age, gender, and ethnicity. Annotators were shown series of pairs of face images and asked to select which individual they would prefer as a colleague. We gathered responses from 451 annotators and aggregated the annotations to compute a preference score for each image. This dataset provides a basis for understanding human bias in colleague preference and can support the development of fair and unbiased AI models for use in recruitment settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/data11050100
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferred Colleague Dataset: A Human-Annotated Dataset of Perceived Colleague Preference

Hamid Gazerpour, Michael Danner, Matthias Rätsch, Bakir Hadžić et al.
Data
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Preferred Colleague Dataset: A Human-Annotated Dataset of Perceived Colleague Preference

Hamid Gazerpour, Michael Danner, Matthias Rätsch, Bakir Hadžić, Deepu Krishnareddy, Zhuoqi Zeng
article en

Abstract

Recruitment is a time-consuming process, and AI systems are increasingly being used to support the decision-making process. However, machine learning models used in such systems can inherit bias if the underlying training data reflects biased human preferences. It is essential to analyze and quantify these biases in order to develop fairer AI systems. To address this issue, we collected human judgments of colleague preference for 2200 face images. The face image set includes images of different ethnicities and genders, as well as both real and synthetically generated faces. The images were annotated by humans from diverse backgrounds in terms of age, gender, and ethnicity. Annotators were shown series of pairs of face images and asked to select which individual they would prefer as a colleague. We gathered responses from 451 annotators and aggregated the annotations to compute a preference score for each image. This dataset provides a basis for understanding human bias in colleague preference and can support the development of fair and unbiased AI models for use in recruitment settings.

DataVol. 11(5)
Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), Bochum University of Applied Sciences (DE), Reutlingen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.