Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Small Ruminant Farmers Regarding Antimicrobial Use, Antimicrobial Resistance and Residues

There is growing concern that antimicrobial use (AMU) in livestock may contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in humans and lead to the consumption of animal-derived foods contaminated with antimicrobial residues. As stakeholders in the livestock industry, farmers must participate in the joint effort to reduce AMU. This cross-sectional study, based on a survey questionnaire, was conducted to evaluate the biosafety measures implemented on small ruminant farms and to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of small ruminant farmers regarding AMU, AMR and residues. The mean biosafety score obtained was 8.4 points on a 0–17 scale. Some biosafety measures appeared difficult to implement, namely vehicle disinfection, requiring visitors to change clothing and footwear at the farm entrance, cleaning and disinfecting farm facilities, using high-pressure washing equipment, and requiring employees to change clothing and footwear upon entering the farm. Although farmers self-reported moderate levels of knowledge (4.9 points on a 0–7 scale) and positive attitudes (5.8 points on a 0–7 scale), significant gaps in knowledge about antibiotics and antimicrobial stewardship persisted. Practices received lower scores (4.7 on a 0–7 scale), especially regarding medication recording, leftover antibiotic management, and waste disposal. Cluster analysis identified distinct farmer profiles with different patterns of knowledge and practices. These findings underscore the importance of considering farmer heterogeneity when designing interventions aimed at improving AMU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ruminants
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants6020031
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Small Ruminant Farmers Regarding Antimicrobial Use, Antimicrobial Resistance and Residues

Pedro Carreira, João Castelo Branco, Nuno Santo, A.C. Fernandes et al.
Ruminants
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
article

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Small Ruminant Farmers Regarding Antimicrobial Use, Antimicrobial Resistance and Residues

Pedro Carreira, João Castelo Branco, Nuno Santo, A.C. Fernandes, João Serejo, Madalena Malva, Pedro Caseiro, Maria de Aires Pereira, Alexandra Lameira Baptista, Luís Figueira, Mariana Rosário, Alda F. A. Pires, Rita Cruz, Carolina Figueiredo, Daniel Correia, Ana Carolina Ferreira, Fernando Esteves, Rui Fragona
article en

Abstract

There is growing concern that antimicrobial use (AMU) in livestock may contribute to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in humans and lead to the consumption of animal-derived foods contaminated with antimicrobial residues. As stakeholders in the livestock industry, farmers must participate in the joint effort to reduce AMU. This cross-sectional study, based on a survey questionnaire, was conducted to evaluate the biosafety measures implemented on small ruminant farms and to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of small ruminant farmers regarding AMU, AMR and residues. The mean biosafety score obtained was 8.4 points on a 0–17 scale. Some biosafety measures appeared difficult to implement, namely vehicle disinfection, requiring visitors to change clothing and footwear at the farm entrance, cleaning and disinfecting farm facilities, using high-pressure washing equipment, and requiring employees to change clothing and footwear upon entering the farm. Although farmers self-reported moderate levels of knowledge (4.9 points on a 0–7 scale) and positive attitudes (5.8 points on a 0–7 scale), significant gaps in knowledge about antibiotics and antimicrobial stewardship persisted. Practices received lower scores (4.7 on a 0–7 scale), especially regarding medication recording, leftover antibiotic management, and waste disposal. Cluster analysis identified distinct farmer profiles with different patterns of knowledge and practices. These findings underscore the importance of considering farmer heterogeneity when designing interventions aimed at improving AMU.

RuminantsVol. 6(2)
Universidade Politécnica de Castelo Branco (PT), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Prefeitura do Município de São Paulo (BR), SGS (Portugal) (PT), Celulose Beira Industrial (Portugal) (PT), National Centre for Research and Development (PL), Polytechnic Institute of Viseu (PT), University of California, Davis (US), Colégio Pedro II (BR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.