28-Day Unconfined Compression Screening and Direct-Shear Response of Cement- and Lime-Stabilized Dredged Clay Modified with Fibers and SBR Latex

Fine-grained dredged clay is difficult to reuse without treatment due to its high water content and weak soil structure. From a sustainability perspective, this limitation poses challenges for the beneficial reuse of dredged materials and often leads to disposal and increased demand for natural resources. In this study, the 28-day mechanical behavior of stabilized dredged clay, treated with cement or lime and modified with coir fiber, polypropylene (PP) fiber, and styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) latex, was systematically investigated through experimental measurements, with an emphasis on resource-efficient and sustainable ground improvement. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) results showed that the UCS of dredged clay stabilized with 4% cement was 374 kPa, and this value increased linearly with increasing cement content, reaching 2487 kPa at 16% cement. In contrast, the UCS of dredged clay stabilized with 16% lime was approximately 30% of that achieved with cement at the same dosage, at only 780 kPa, indicating the need to balance mechanical performance with the environmental impact associated with high cement usage and its carbon footprint. In addition, the inclusion of fibers significantly enhanced the UCS of the stabilized soil samples. The experimental results indicate that the UCS of specimens stabilized with 16% cement could be doubled with the addition of fibers, suggesting the potential to achieve target strength with reduced binder content, thereby contributing to a low-carbon and material-efficient design. Among the fibers tested, coir fiber exhibited better performance than PP fiber in improving UCS, highlighting the effectiveness of natural, renewable, and biodegradable materials in sustainable soil stabilization. Furthermore, fiber length also influenced the UCS of the stabilized soil samples. Additionally, the direct shear test results indicated that both fiber content and length played important roles in determining the internal friction angle of the stabilized soil. It was observed that stabilized soil reinforced with 6 mm fibers exhibited a higher internal friction angle compared to that reinforced with 12 mm fibers. These findings provide insights into optimizing material composition for improved mechanical performance while supporting environmentally sustainable and resource-efficient geotechnical practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094462
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

28-Day Unconfined Compression Screening and Direct-Shear Response of Cement- and Lime-Stabilized Dredged Clay Modified with Fibers and SBR Latex

Yiyao Zhu, Jean Claude Sugira, Fan Xiao, Ruchen Ma et al.
Sustainability
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

28-Day Unconfined Compression Screening and Direct-Shear Response of Cement- and Lime-Stabilized Dredged Clay Modified with Fibers and SBR Latex

Yiyao Zhu, Jean Claude Sugira, Fan Xiao, Ruchen Ma, Edson Da Graça M. Cumbe, Philemon Niyogakiza, Xiangzhao Liu, Qian Zhai, Tianci Han
article en

Abstract

Fine-grained dredged clay is difficult to reuse without treatment due to its high water content and weak soil structure. From a sustainability perspective, this limitation poses challenges for the beneficial reuse of dredged materials and often leads to disposal and increased demand for natural resources. In this study, the 28-day mechanical behavior of stabilized dredged clay, treated with cement or lime and modified with coir fiber, polypropylene (PP) fiber, and styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) latex, was systematically investigated through experimental measurements, with an emphasis on resource-efficient and sustainable ground improvement. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) results showed that the UCS of dredged clay stabilized with 4% cement was 374 kPa, and this value increased linearly with increasing cement content, reaching 2487 kPa at 16% cement. In contrast, the UCS of dredged clay stabilized with 16% lime was approximately 30% of that achieved with cement at the same dosage, at only 780 kPa, indicating the need to balance mechanical performance with the environmental impact associated with high cement usage and its carbon footprint. In addition, the inclusion of fibers significantly enhanced the UCS of the stabilized soil samples. The experimental results indicate that the UCS of specimens stabilized with 16% cement could be doubled with the addition of fibers, suggesting the potential to achieve target strength with reduced binder content, thereby contributing to a low-carbon and material-efficient design. Among the fibers tested, coir fiber exhibited better performance than PP fiber in improving UCS, highlighting the effectiveness of natural, renewable, and biodegradable materials in sustainable soil stabilization. Furthermore, fiber length also influenced the UCS of the stabilized soil samples. Additionally, the direct shear test results indicated that both fiber content and length played important roles in determining the internal friction angle of the stabilized soil. It was observed that stabilized soil reinforced with 6 mm fibers exhibited a higher internal friction angle compared to that reinforced with 12 mm fibers. These findings provide insights into optimizing material composition for improved mechanical performance while supporting environmentally sustainable and resource-efficient geotechnical practices.

SustainabilityVol. 18(9)
China Railway Shanghai Design Institute Group (China) (CN), China State Construction Engineering (China) (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.