Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting: A Call for Formal Education During Medical School [ID 4002]

INTRODUCTION: Female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) affects approximately 500,000 individuals in the United States and can result in devastating health outcomes such as chronic pelvic infections, pregnancy complications, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Despite the wide prevalence and health consequences, FGM/C education is largely absent from U.S. medical schools. Consequently, physicians are underprepared to screen for or manage affected patients. This study evaluates the current state of FGM/C education in U.S. medical schools and explores students’ interest in the topic. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to participants currently enrolled in accredited U.S. medical schools. The survey assessed prior exposure to FGM/C education, perceived benefit of such training, and interest in additional learning. Data frequencies and associations between demographics and perceptions were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 173 students responded. Most students (83.2%, n=144) reported no formal education on FGM/C, yet 91.3% (n=158) expressed interest in receiving training. 68.2% (n=118) felt education on this topic would benefit them as physicians. Students identifying as female (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.788; 95% CI, 1.538–9.332) and those attending schools in the west (AOR 3.962; 95% CI, 1.326–11.842) were significantly more likely to hold this belief. Among students who received FGM/C education, 50% of students learned about it in the context of obstetrics and gynecology. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Despite limited formal instruction, medical students overwhelmingly support inclusion of FGM/C in curricula. Introducing this content during the required third-year ob-gyn and pediatrics rotations may provide effective exposure. Further research is needed to define the scope and means of these curricular changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006268.45
Primary Topic
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting: A Call for Formal Education During Medical School [ID 4002]

Briana M. Barns
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
article

Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting: A Call for Formal Education During Medical School [ID 4002]

Briana M. Barns
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) affects approximately 500,000 individuals in the United States and can result in devastating health outcomes such as chronic pelvic infections, pregnancy complications, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Despite the wide prevalence and health consequences, FGM/C education is largely absent from U.S. medical schools. Consequently, physicians are underprepared to screen for or manage affected patients. This study evaluates the current state of FGM/C education in U.S. medical schools and explores students’ interest in the topic. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to participants currently enrolled in accredited U.S. medical schools. The survey assessed prior exposure to FGM/C education, perceived benefit of such training, and interest in additional learning. Data frequencies and associations between demographics and perceptions were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 173 students responded. Most students (83.2%, n=144) reported no formal education on FGM/C, yet 91.3% (n=158) expressed interest in receiving training. 68.2% (n=118) felt education on this topic would benefit them as physicians. Students identifying as female (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.788; 95% CI, 1.538–9.332) and those attending schools in the west (AOR 3.962; 95% CI, 1.326–11.842) were significantly more likely to hold this belief. Among students who received FGM/C education, 50% of students learned about it in the context of obstetrics and gynecology. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Despite limited formal instruction, medical students overwhelmingly support inclusion of FGM/C in curricula. Introducing this content during the required third-year ob-gyn and pediatrics rotations may provide effective exposure. Further research is needed to define the scope and means of these curricular changes.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 147(5S)
Albany Medical Center Hospital (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Female Genital Mutilation and Cutting: A Call for Formal Education During Medical School [ID 4002] — Briana M. Barns · Obstetrics and Gynecology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS