Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Cost of Equity Capital: A Meta‐Analytical Review

ABSTRACT Despite extensive research on the relationship between corporate environmental responsibility (CER) and cost of equity capital (COEC), empirical evidence remains inconsistent. This study addresses these inconsistencies through a comprehensive meta‐analysis of 1139 effect sizes from 75 studies. The analysis establishes a statistically significant but economically weak negative association ( r = −0.041, p < 0.001), indicating that enhanced environmental practices reduce financing costs, though the magnitude is practically negligible by conventional standards. This relationship proves robust across multiple tests. The analysis also examines previously under‐explored moderators, finding significant effects of economic conditions (economic development and crises) and regulatory frameworks (disclosure and performance regulations), whereas the sociocultural background shows inconclusive results. Moreover, the analysis detects limited publication bias, which does not, however, alter the main conclusions. These findings provide the first meta‐analytical benchmark estimate of the CER–COEC relationship and highlight the need to shift research focus from establishing the relationship's existence to investigating its economic relevance, offering valuable insights for researchers, managers, policymakers, and investors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70853
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Cost of Equity Capital: A Meta‐Analytical Review

Ewald Aschauer, Helmut Pernsteiner, Robert Witte
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Cost of Equity Capital: A Meta‐Analytical Review

Ewald Aschauer, Helmut Pernsteiner, Robert Witte
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite extensive research on the relationship between corporate environmental responsibility (CER) and cost of equity capital (COEC), empirical evidence remains inconsistent. This study addresses these inconsistencies through a comprehensive meta‐analysis of 1139 effect sizes from 75 studies. The analysis establishes a statistically significant but economically weak negative association ( r = −0.041, p < 0.001), indicating that enhanced environmental practices reduce financing costs, though the magnitude is practically negligible by conventional standards. This relationship proves robust across multiple tests. The analysis also examines previously under‐explored moderators, finding significant effects of economic conditions (economic development and crises) and regulatory frameworks (disclosure and performance regulations), whereas the sociocultural background shows inconclusive results. Moreover, the analysis detects limited publication bias, which does not, however, alter the main conclusions. These findings provide the first meta‐analytical benchmark estimate of the CER–COEC relationship and highlight the need to shift research focus from establishing the relationship's existence to investigating its economic relevance, offering valuable insights for researchers, managers, policymakers, and investors.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.