Underground hydrogen storage site suitability from the views of efficiency, cost, and risk — A site selection framework for decision-makers

Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) in porous media is emerging as a key enabler of large-scale, long-duration energy storage to support net-zero energy systems. However, determining suitable storage sites remains a complex, multidisciplinary challenge based on the integration of technical, economic, and risk-related considerations, often leaving an abstract “black-box” impression to non-specialists such as policy stakeholders and the public. This study presents a transparent and easy-to-grasp conceptual framework for UHS site suitability assessment, built around three interdependent pillars: efficiency, cost, and risk. Each is assessed using proxy parameters—such as permeability, depth, and well density—and combined into a unified visual model that defines a “suitability zone” representing the unified conditions under which all three aspects meet project requirements. The applicability of the framework is demonstrated by assessing a set of oil and gas fields in the Irish Sea Basin, resulting in the identification of ‘suitable sites’ for UHS that satisfy minimum thresholds across all criteria representing the three aspects. The conceptual framework supports transparent and structured decision-making by making explicit how geological, operational, and contextual factors interact to determine site suitability. The proposed approach offers a flexible and transferable decision-support tool for early-stage UHS project screening, ranking, and investment prioritisation. It is also adaptable to other subsurface technologies such as the storage of carbon dioxide and natural gas, and geothermal energy storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2026.102349
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underground hydrogen storage site suitability from the views of efficiency, cost, and risk — A site selection framework for decision-makers

Niklas Heinemann, David Iacopini, Maryam Dzulkefli, Juan Alcalde et al.
Energy Strategy Reviews
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Underground hydrogen storage site suitability from the views of efficiency, cost, and risk — A site selection framework for decision-makers

Niklas Heinemann, David Iacopini, Maryam Dzulkefli, Juan Alcalde, Johannes Miocic
article en

Abstract

Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) in porous media is emerging as a key enabler of large-scale, long-duration energy storage to support net-zero energy systems. However, determining suitable storage sites remains a complex, multidisciplinary challenge based on the integration of technical, economic, and risk-related considerations, often leaving an abstract “black-box” impression to non-specialists such as policy stakeholders and the public. This study presents a transparent and easy-to-grasp conceptual framework for UHS site suitability assessment, built around three interdependent pillars: efficiency, cost, and risk. Each is assessed using proxy parameters—such as permeability, depth, and well density—and combined into a unified visual model that defines a “suitability zone” representing the unified conditions under which all three aspects meet project requirements. The applicability of the framework is demonstrated by assessing a set of oil and gas fields in the Irish Sea Basin, resulting in the identification of ‘suitable sites’ for UHS that satisfy minimum thresholds across all criteria representing the three aspects. The conceptual framework supports transparent and structured decision-making by making explicit how geological, operational, and contextual factors interact to determine site suitability. The proposed approach offers a flexible and transferable decision-support tool for early-stage UHS project screening, ranking, and investment prioritisation. It is also adaptable to other subsurface technologies such as the storage of carbon dioxide and natural gas, and geothermal energy storage.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 67
University of Groningen (NL), Geociencias Barcelona (ES), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.