Returning to <i>Manufacturing Consent</i> 45 years on

We open the special section ‘Forty-five Years of Manufacturing Consent ’ by returning to Michael Burawoy’s Manufacturing Consent 45 years after its publication to ask why it remains both enduring and contested in the sociology of work. Burawoy’s core insight was that workplace order is not secured by control alone: consent can be organised through everyday routines, incentives, relationships, and ‘games’ that make work workable even when power is uneven. Yet work has changed sharply since 1979, raising fresh questions about where consent is now produced when labour is dispersed across platforms, homes, care settings and fragmented labour markets, and how agency and subjectivity are shaped under precarity. The timing of this revisit is also shaped by Burawoy’s tragic passing in February 2025, which has prompted renewed reflection on his intellectual legacy and his commitments to engaged sociology. In this introductory article, we ask what the book helps us see now, what it cannot capture, and what it still provokes, then we introduce the papers in the section and reflect on what they mean for research on work, labour politics and sociological practice going forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Sociological Review
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261261425519
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Returning to Manufacturing Consent 45 years on

Constantine Manolchev, Ryan Nolan
The Sociological Review
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Returning to Manufacturing Consent 45 years on

Constantine Manolchev, Ryan Nolan
article en

Abstract

We open the special section ‘Forty-five Years of Manufacturing Consent ’ by returning to Michael Burawoy’s Manufacturing Consent 45 years after its publication to ask why it remains both enduring and contested in the sociology of work. Burawoy’s core insight was that workplace order is not secured by control alone: consent can be organised through everyday routines, incentives, relationships, and ‘games’ that make work workable even when power is uneven. Yet work has changed sharply since 1979, raising fresh questions about where consent is now produced when labour is dispersed across platforms, homes, care settings and fragmented labour markets, and how agency and subjectivity are shaped under precarity. The timing of this revisit is also shaped by Burawoy’s tragic passing in February 2025, which has prompted renewed reflection on his intellectual legacy and his commitments to engaged sociology. In this introductory article, we ask what the book helps us see now, what it cannot capture, and what it still provokes, then we introduce the papers in the section and reflect on what they mean for research on work, labour politics and sociological practice going forward.

The Sociological ReviewVol. 74(3)
University of Exeter (GB), University of Salford (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Returning to <i>Manufacturing Consent</i> 45 years on — Constantine Manolchev, Ryan Nolan · The Sociological Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS