Validation of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire after severe COVID-19

Background Physical inactivity is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 and often worsens after hospitalisation. Clinicians need quick, accurate assessments to target interventions. We aimed to assess the validity of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) in adults recovering one year after COVID-19 hospitalisation . Methods Post-hospitalisation for COVID-19, adults attended a one-year-visit and completed the GPPAQ Physical Activity Index (PAI-4 active), 14-day wrist-worn accelerometry (Moderate-Vigorous PA [MVPA]- active), and other health outcomes. Validity was examined via : (i) internal consistency (factor analysis); (ii) measurement invariance across sex, age, and ethnicity using differential item functioning (DIF); (iii) convergent validity (GPPAQ sensitivity/specificity versus accelerometry); and (iv) construct validity (correlations with health outcomes). Results 752 participants had GPPAQ and accelerometry (265 female, mean± sd age 60.9±11.6 years, MVPA 18.75 min·day −1 (IQR 7.55, 36.11), PAI-1 46.8%, PAI-2 15.6%, PAI-3 19.4%, PAI-4 18.2%. Factor analyses supported good internal consistency with two factors (daily activities, physical exercise). Confirmatory factor Index (CFI) showed excellent fit (CFI 0.965). DIF indicated moderate variability by sex and age. GPPAQ-PAI showed limited sensitivity (26.3%) for correctly classifying physically active individuals, but higher specificity (88.4%) for classifying physical inactivity, and weak-to-moderate correlations with health outcomes. Conclusions GPPAQ demonstrates internal consistency, with construct and convergent validity in adults 1-year post-COVID-19 hospitalisation. GPPAQ effectively identifies inactive individuals to support clinical care; however, its sensitivity suggests underestimation of activity relative to accelerometry. Future pathways should combine GPPAQ with device-based assessment to optimise evaluation of physical activity to guide pulmonary rehabilitation and targeted interventions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ERJ Open Research
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01496-2025
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire after severe COVID-19

Molly Baldwin, Nicolette C. Bishop, Claire Lawson, C.F. Bolton et al.
ERJ Open Research
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Validation of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire after severe COVID-19

Molly Baldwin, Nicolette C. Bishop, Claire Lawson, C.F. Bolton, Tatiana Plekhanova, Charlotte L. Edwardson, Maxime Taquet, Jack Sargeant, Daniel Lozano-Rojas, Kimon Ntotsis, Tom Yates, Ewen Harrison, Annemarie Docherty, Hamish McAuley, Neil Greening, William Man, Alex Rowlands (747240), Alexander Horsley, Claire Nolan, Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, Louise V. Wain, Enya Daynes, Betty Raman, Joseph Jacob, James Manifield, Iain Stewart, Ruth M. Saunders, Mathew Thorpe, Katerina Tziannou, Marco Sereno, Lucy Gardiner, Amisha Singapuri, Jennifer K. Quint, Melitta McNarry, Ling-Pei Ho, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Aarti Shikotra, Beatriz Guillen-Guio, Christopher E. Brightling, James D. Chalmers, Lin Wang, Nazir Lone, Olivia Leavy, William Greenhalf, David J. Stensel, Omer Elneima, Rachael A. Evans, Victoria Harris, Sally Singh, Michael Marks, Matthew Richardson, Claudia Efstathiou
article en

Abstract

Background Physical inactivity is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 and often worsens after hospitalisation. Clinicians need quick, accurate assessments to target interventions. We aimed to assess the validity of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) in adults recovering one year after COVID-19 hospitalisation . Methods Post-hospitalisation for COVID-19, adults attended a one-year-visit and completed the GPPAQ Physical Activity Index (PAI-4 active), 14-day wrist-worn accelerometry (Moderate-Vigorous PA [MVPA]- active), and other health outcomes. Validity was examined via : (i) internal consistency (factor analysis); (ii) measurement invariance across sex, age, and ethnicity using differential item functioning (DIF); (iii) convergent validity (GPPAQ sensitivity/specificity versus accelerometry); and (iv) construct validity (correlations with health outcomes). Results 752 participants had GPPAQ and accelerometry (265 female, mean± sd age 60.9±11.6 years, MVPA 18.75 min·day −1 (IQR 7.55, 36.11), PAI-1 46.8%, PAI-2 15.6%, PAI-3 19.4%, PAI-4 18.2%. Factor analyses supported good internal consistency with two factors (daily activities, physical exercise). Confirmatory factor Index (CFI) showed excellent fit (CFI 0.965). DIF indicated moderate variability by sex and age. GPPAQ-PAI showed limited sensitivity (26.3%) for correctly classifying physically active individuals, but higher specificity (88.4%) for classifying physical inactivity, and weak-to-moderate correlations with health outcomes. Conclusions GPPAQ demonstrates internal consistency, with construct and convergent validity in adults 1-year post-COVID-19 hospitalisation. GPPAQ effectively identifies inactive individuals to support clinical care; however, its sensitivity suggests underestimation of activity relative to accelerometry. Future pathways should combine GPPAQ with device-based assessment to optimise evaluation of physical activity to guide pulmonary rehabilitation and targeted interventions.

ERJ Open Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.