Beyond Tools: How Technology Shapes Graphing and Pedagogical Reasoning in Mathematics Teacher Education

Abstract Although there has been considerable research on the use of technology in mathematics education, little is known about how it supports or hinders the development of crucial mathematical concepts, such as functions. This study explores the factors behind creating graphs of functions that accurately reflect mathematical concepts using a modeling problem from a Hungarian eighth-grade textbook. We specifically examine the meta-representational aspect of graphing proficiency—the ability to interpret and construct graphs based on deep mathematical understanding. The research involved 53 Hungarian pre-service mathematics teachers to understand how different technological tools influence their solutions to this modeling problem, particularly their representational competence and pedagogical reasoning. Results suggest that while technology can aid in different function representations, it does not negate the need for a strong mathematical background, as evidenced by common misconceptions about continuity and overuse of linearity in our study. This study advocates for a balanced approach that fosters technological proficiency and deep mathematical understanding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-026-00478-1
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Tools: How Technology Shapes Graphing and Pedagogical Reasoning in Mathematics Teacher Education

Ilona Téglási, Zoltán Kovács
Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Beyond Tools: How Technology Shapes Graphing and Pedagogical Reasoning in Mathematics Teacher Education

Ilona Téglási, Zoltán Kovács
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although there has been considerable research on the use of technology in mathematics education, little is known about how it supports or hinders the development of crucial mathematical concepts, such as functions. This study explores the factors behind creating graphs of functions that accurately reflect mathematical concepts using a modeling problem from a Hungarian eighth-grade textbook. We specifically examine the meta-representational aspect of graphing proficiency—the ability to interpret and construct graphs based on deep mathematical understanding. The research involved 53 Hungarian pre-service mathematics teachers to understand how different technological tools influence their solutions to this modeling problem, particularly their representational competence and pedagogical reasoning. Results suggest that while technology can aid in different function representations, it does not negate the need for a strong mathematical background, as evidenced by common misconceptions about continuity and overuse of linearity in our study. This study advocates for a balanced approach that fosters technological proficiency and deep mathematical understanding.

Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology EducationVol. 26(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Tools: How Technology Shapes Graphing and Pedagogical Reasoning in Mathematics Teacher Education — Ilona Téglási, Zoltán Kovács · Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS