AI4Deliberation_D4.1 – AI toolkit, Architecture and Knowledge Graph – first version

This deliverable (D4.1) reports on the technical infrastructure of the AI4Deliberation project, consolidating the work of the first two sprints of Work Package 4 (Tasks T4.1 and T4.2). It documents the technical foundations that enable AI4Deliberation's AI-assisted, multimodal, and gamified deliberations. In line with the Grant Agreement, the deliverable presents three main contributions: · WP4 AI toolkit and sandbox used to identify, evaluate, and operationalise open-source AI tools and models (including LLMs and multimodal/video-capable models) as deliberation services. The sandbox provides a controlled and repeatable testing environment across pilots and languages, supporting evidence-driven refinement and exposing AI functionality as reusable services via APIs. · First operational design of the Deliberation Knowledge Graph (DKG), including a dual-layer semantic model (ontological blueprint and FAIR data governance) and adoption of the IBIS framework as a core logical grammar to represent issues, positions, and arguments. The DKG layer is complemented by a Multi-Agent RAG ("Cognitive Retrieval") mechanism that translates natural-language questions into validated SPARQL queries. · First and refined versions of the Reference Architecture, evolving from the Technical Annex vision (v1) to an implementation-facing blueprint (v2) organised into distinct layers (Interaction, Data Preprocessing, Intelligence, and an enveloping Compliance layer), with explicit platform integration targets, formalised preprocessing readiness gates, and end-to-end compliance aligned with GDPR, AI Act considerations, and FAIR principles. WP4's implementation follows an agile, ethics-by-design methodology, applying the ALTAI framework as a shared operational reference for the EU's Trustworthy AI requirements. The deliverable also outlines ongoing T4.2 work to refine and (where needed) fine-tune and re-evaluate models, provide concrete AI services for pilots (e.g., deliberation summarisation and gamification), and deploy and populate a FAIR Deliberation Knowledge Graph hosted in an open-source graph database. The AI services covered include summarisation, argument extraction, moderation, translation, topic modelling, gamification, and conversational analysis, integrated across the four project pilots (German, Greek, International, and Italian).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20020032
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI4Deliberation_D4.1 – AI toolkit, Architecture and Knowledge Graph – first version

Efthimios Tambouris, Dimitris Zeginis, Evangelos Rigas, Aleš Završník et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI4Deliberation_D4.1 – AI toolkit, Architecture and Knowledge Graph – first version

Efthimios Tambouris, Dimitris Zeginis, Evangelos Rigas, Aleš Završník, Rafail Promikyridis, Konstantinos Tarabanis, Gerasimos Papanikolaou-Ntais, Bram Delisse, Christos Fanourios Patsouras, Saša Krajnc, Eimear Maguire, David Price, Epameinondas Koutavelis, Jorim Theuns, Sem Johannes Joseph Nouws
article en

Abstract

This deliverable (D4.1) reports on the technical infrastructure of the AI4Deliberation project, consolidating the work of the first two sprints of Work Package 4 (Tasks T4.1 and T4.2). It documents the technical foundations that enable AI4Deliberation's AI-assisted, multimodal, and gamified deliberations. In line with the Grant Agreement, the deliverable presents three main contributions: · WP4 AI toolkit and sandbox used to identify, evaluate, and operationalise open-source AI tools and models (including LLMs and multimodal/video-capable models) as deliberation services. The sandbox provides a controlled and repeatable testing environment across pilots and languages, supporting evidence-driven refinement and exposing AI functionality as reusable services via APIs. · First operational design of the Deliberation Knowledge Graph (DKG), including a dual-layer semantic model (ontological blueprint and FAIR data governance) and adoption of the IBIS framework as a core logical grammar to represent issues, positions, and arguments. The DKG layer is complemented by a Multi-Agent RAG ("Cognitive Retrieval") mechanism that translates natural-language questions into validated SPARQL queries. · First and refined versions of the Reference Architecture, evolving from the Technical Annex vision (v1) to an implementation-facing blueprint (v2) organised into distinct layers (Interaction, Data Preprocessing, Intelligence, and an enveloping Compliance layer), with explicit platform integration targets, formalised preprocessing readiness gates, and end-to-end compliance aligned with GDPR, AI Act considerations, and FAIR principles. WP4's implementation follows an agile, ethics-by-design methodology, applying the ALTAI framework as a shared operational reference for the EU's Trustworthy AI requirements. The deliverable also outlines ongoing T4.2 work to refine and (where needed) fine-tune and re-evaluate models, provide concrete AI services for pilots (e.g., deliberation summarisation and gamification), and deploy and populate a FAIR Deliberation Knowledge Graph hosted in an open-source graph database. The AI services covered include summarisation, argument extraction, moderation, translation, topic modelling, gamification, and conversational analysis, integrated across the four project pilots (German, Greek, International, and Italian).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Dundee (GB), Engineering Systems (United States) (US), Membrane Technology & Research (United States) (US), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR), Kemakta Konsult (SE), International Institute of Islamic Thought (US), Institute of Criminology (SI), Delft University of Technology (NL)
European Commission
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.