Pulsed Electric Field Ablation for Advanced Lung and Oligometastatic Disease: A Retrospective Study of 32 Consecutive Patients in a Community Hospital Setting

Background/Objectives: Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) therapy is a non-thermal ablation technique that induces immunogenic cell death through high-voltage, short-duration electrical pulses. This may enhance antitumor immunity by releasing intact tumor antigens and potentially generating abscopal effects. We report early outcomes in 32 patients with primary lung cancer or lung oligometastases treated with PEF at a community hospital, with a median (IQR) follow-up of 180.5 (158–207) days. Methods: This retrospective study collected demographics, cancer type, treatment response, and outcomes for patients undergoing PEF ablation. Tumor response was assessed using Sum of Longest Dimensions per RECIST 1.1 to classify progressive disease, stable disease, partial response, or complete response. Volumetric changes were additionally analyzed using RECIST 1.1 percentage thresholds applied to change in volume. Results: At initial 3-month follow-up, 26 of 32 patients demonstrated stable disease, partial response, or complete response, suggesting an 81.25% disease control rate/clinical benefit rate among this cohort. Among patients with Stage III–IV disease, 27.6% (8/29) showed radiographic evidence of a possible abscopal response. At 6 months, 24 of 32 patients remained alive and evaluable, with 62.5% (20/32) maintaining stable disease, partial response, or complete response. Conclusions: Despite patients having progressive disease on systemic therapy before PEF, early outcomes post-ablation suggest favorable local control and potential immunologic benefit. Patients with early-stage disease not receiving systemic therapy also showed excellent local response. Patients tolerated therapy very well. Clinical benefit was observed in 81.25% of patients at 3 months and 62.5% at 6 months, with radiographic evidence of possible abscopal responses in 27.6% of advanced-stage patients, supporting further exploration of the immunogenic potential of PEF demonstrated in preclinical and emerging clinical studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18091459
Primary Topic
Microbial Inactivation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pulsed Electric Field Ablation for Advanced Lung and Oligometastatic Disease: A Retrospective Study of 32 Consecutive Patients in a Community Hospital Setting

Justin Thomas, Varun Roperia
Cancers
Microbial Inactivation Methods
article

Pulsed Electric Field Ablation for Advanced Lung and Oligometastatic Disease: A Retrospective Study of 32 Consecutive Patients in a Community Hospital Setting

Justin Thomas, Varun Roperia
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) therapy is a non-thermal ablation technique that induces immunogenic cell death through high-voltage, short-duration electrical pulses. This may enhance antitumor immunity by releasing intact tumor antigens and potentially generating abscopal effects. We report early outcomes in 32 patients with primary lung cancer or lung oligometastases treated with PEF at a community hospital, with a median (IQR) follow-up of 180.5 (158–207) days. Methods: This retrospective study collected demographics, cancer type, treatment response, and outcomes for patients undergoing PEF ablation. Tumor response was assessed using Sum of Longest Dimensions per RECIST 1.1 to classify progressive disease, stable disease, partial response, or complete response. Volumetric changes were additionally analyzed using RECIST 1.1 percentage thresholds applied to change in volume. Results: At initial 3-month follow-up, 26 of 32 patients demonstrated stable disease, partial response, or complete response, suggesting an 81.25% disease control rate/clinical benefit rate among this cohort. Among patients with Stage III–IV disease, 27.6% (8/29) showed radiographic evidence of a possible abscopal response. At 6 months, 24 of 32 patients remained alive and evaluable, with 62.5% (20/32) maintaining stable disease, partial response, or complete response. Conclusions: Despite patients having progressive disease on systemic therapy before PEF, early outcomes post-ablation suggest favorable local control and potential immunologic benefit. Patients with early-stage disease not receiving systemic therapy also showed excellent local response. Patients tolerated therapy very well. Clinical benefit was observed in 81.25% of patients at 3 months and 62.5% at 6 months, with radiographic evidence of possible abscopal responses in 27.6% of advanced-stage patients, supporting further exploration of the immunogenic potential of PEF demonstrated in preclinical and emerging clinical studies.

CancersVol. 18(9)
Eisenhower Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Microbial Inactivation Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pulsed Electric Field Ablation for Advanced Lung and Oligometastatic Disease: A Retrospective Study of 32 Consecutive Patients in a Community Hospital Setting — Justin Thomas, Varun Roperia · Cancers (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS