Diagnostic Challenges in Nodal T-Follicular Helper (TFH) Cell Lymphoma

Nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphomas comprise a biologically similar but morphologically diverse family of T-cell neoplasms, including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma, follicular-type, and nodal TFH lymphoma, not otherwise specified. Despite recurrent molecular alterations involving RHOA, IDH2, TET2, and DNMT3A, the diagnosis of TFH lymphomas remains challenging because of their mimicry of other lymphoid neoplasms and reactive lymphadenopathy. A key pitfall is confusion with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, as admixed Epstein–Barr virus-positive large B-cells with Reed–Sternberg cell-like morphology and immunophenotype can be found in TFH lymphomas. Similarly, follicular-type TFH lymphoma is often misclassified as follicular B-cell lymphoma unless T-cell lineage is investigated by immunophenotyping and the absence of BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangement is established. The ‘not otherwise specified’ category should be reserved for cases with proven T-follicular helper immunophenotype but lacks definitive angioimmunoblastic or follicular architecture. Comparing current frameworks, 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification permits rare CD4/CD8 double negative cases, while International Consensus Classification requires CD4 positivity. Some of these distinctions may appear taxonomic as all T-follicular helper T-cell lymphoma subtypes share molecular alterations, prognosis, and treatment approach. However, these classifications are meaningful from the perspective of a histopathologic diagnosis as a wrong diagnosis may lead to ineffective treatment approach. Accurate recognition of these lymphomas prevents misclassification, avoids inappropriate regimens, and ensures eligibility for proper clinical trials. A structured approach integrating morphology, multiparameter immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and molecular testing provides the best safeguard against diagnostic pitfalls and refines classification across subtypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioMed
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed6020012
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Challenges in Nodal T-Follicular Helper (TFH) Cell Lymphoma

Pratik Q. Deb, Neha Seth, Phyu Thin Naing
BioMed
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Diagnostic Challenges in Nodal T-Follicular Helper (TFH) Cell Lymphoma

Pratik Q. Deb, Neha Seth, Phyu Thin Naing
article en

Abstract

Nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphomas comprise a biologically similar but morphologically diverse family of T-cell neoplasms, including angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma, follicular-type, and nodal TFH lymphoma, not otherwise specified. Despite recurrent molecular alterations involving RHOA, IDH2, TET2, and DNMT3A, the diagnosis of TFH lymphomas remains challenging because of their mimicry of other lymphoid neoplasms and reactive lymphadenopathy. A key pitfall is confusion with classical Hodgkin lymphoma, as admixed Epstein–Barr virus-positive large B-cells with Reed–Sternberg cell-like morphology and immunophenotype can be found in TFH lymphomas. Similarly, follicular-type TFH lymphoma is often misclassified as follicular B-cell lymphoma unless T-cell lineage is investigated by immunophenotyping and the absence of BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangement is established. The ‘not otherwise specified’ category should be reserved for cases with proven T-follicular helper immunophenotype but lacks definitive angioimmunoblastic or follicular architecture. Comparing current frameworks, 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification permits rare CD4/CD8 double negative cases, while International Consensus Classification requires CD4 positivity. Some of these distinctions may appear taxonomic as all T-follicular helper T-cell lymphoma subtypes share molecular alterations, prognosis, and treatment approach. However, these classifications are meaningful from the perspective of a histopathologic diagnosis as a wrong diagnosis may lead to ineffective treatment approach. Accurate recognition of these lymphomas prevents misclassification, avoids inappropriate regimens, and ensures eligibility for proper clinical trials. A structured approach integrating morphology, multiparameter immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and molecular testing provides the best safeguard against diagnostic pitfalls and refines classification across subtypes.

BioMedVol. 6(2)
Northwell Health (US), Long Island Jewish Medical Center (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Northwell Health
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.